I hope I wasnt being insensitive to anyones feelings.
What's up with this drivel? What could this possibly have to do with your pictures. I'm sure no one is in tears because of them. If you had paid attention to what I told you about that camera, your pictures might have been better. You can't learn the mechanics over the phone in 15 minutes after you've had 7 half liters. Don't blame me. My reply was a wakeup call to you. You have the hard part down, as I've said before. The ambient light in those pictures makes it impossible to get shadow detail without flash fill. Some of the action shots require a much wider aperature than your camera will provide, hence the blur and again, the need for fill flash. The guide number (a figure of flash power) of your built in flash is probably the equivalent of a candle at 224 km. What this means is that under those lighting conditions, you'd have to be within maybe 10 feet to get enough flash illumination to get the job done. If you're farther away than that, you'll need an external flash. If your camera won't accept an external flash sync cord, then may I suggest either a Canon D60 or a Nikon D100. Both are digital SLR's in the $2K range. A multipurpose zoom lens for either would run another $500. Both have internal flashes that are much better than the one in your camera. If they aren't enough, then these cameras also accept external flashes via sync cord or hotshoe. The external flash will cost maybe $300. Save your toy, disposable camera for woods and skidder pictures when the going gets tough. $3000 is a lot of money to be sure, but the results will be well worth it. What's 3 months worth of beer or phone calls anyway.
Please stop with the sympathetic whining angle, will ya?