No argument there.
That's not quite right.
Around my part of Virginia, the power companies, VDOT, and utility people will leave wood on the side of the road,
on public property, because
they count on wood scavengers to pick it up and save them the
expense of disposing of it. If it belongs to the public, it belongs to me, too, so
I'm not stealing if I help out with the unwritten, but still very much recognized, standard system for keeping our road sides clear of downed wood.
Just last year VDOT had some crews come along Route 7 (between the Blue Ridge and Hamilton) and cleared out a lot of ailanthus. They neatly cut it to firewood lengths (taking extra time to do so), and stacked it (mostly) alongside the road, chipped the brush, and left the rest to the scavengers. I didn't want any of it myself, but it was fun to watch each pile disappear over the next week or so. Most of it was where you couldn't really find whose property it was in front of, some of it you could have, but it was all clearly on the highway, not private property.
The alternative is for the taxpayers to pick up the tab to have that wood hauled to a landfill and wasted.
I don't see a problem with this system.
Now, on another part of my commute route, there's a bunch of nice oak dumped here and there along the road (a less traveled road) in chunks of various sizes. It's been there since a mid-winter storm, and I think it's pretty clear nobody there wants it. I'm pretty sure it's also on public land, but I don't plan to touch it until:
- I've looked at a plat map to verify it's on public land.
- I stop at each house to ask if it's okay. ONLY AS A COURTESY.
If it turns out it's actually on the private land, I'll ask
as a moral requirement, before I touch it.
Do you see a problem with approach?