Good luck with that, over and out.
I love how a bunch of not loggers show up to defend some punter that makes absurd claims. Most of the regulars on this forum are from northern california, and the rest of us are from western states, we get fire, Hel a bunch of em have made careers fighting forest fires. In fact I lived in a little crap hole called Shingleton for 3 months way back in 1992... about 30 mi north of Redding.
Shakes are not legal in new construction in many areas, that is not the point of me putting ole ted on ignore, its the claiming the gubamint will come and take away your house if you dare put a wooden roof on you domicile, its ignorant, narrow viewed, and largely wrong, it may be true in his area, its certainly not true for most of america.
Furthermore, the man has made many, many dubious claims on other threads, none of them supported by any real evidence, just some wind bags opinion... Hence IGNORE..
I'm not club affiliated as you can see & call it as it lays. You must think getting swotted with an empty lace glove that wouldn't bother a fly is some sort of an attack.That is a truly beautiful ad hominem attack, brings a tear to me eye.
Yes, I am a glass-jawed baby with skin like wet toilet paper, it is a relief to have you here to school me proper.
Club affiliation can hyper sensitise some.Yes, I am a glass-jawed baby with skin like wet toilet paper, it is a relief to have you here to school me proper.
Am I missing anything important or should I leave Bwildered under the porch with the rest of the chew toys?
It doesn't work that well to hide the bias though.Probably the latter, though it could be amusing. I'm just playing passive-aggressive because it amuses me more than just ignoring.
Then coast into Winthrop and only one more pass to go over and it is only 4000 feet. It has a couple of curves on the east side. I'd buy you a burrito grande at the taco wagon in downtown Okanogan. They are good and cheap.
Probably the latter, though it could be amusing. I'm just playing passive-aggressive because it amuses me more than just ignoring.
We just now build with non combustible materials & have property static water reserves with roof sprinkler systems in high fire risk zones.Which brings me back to my oft-repeated statement that the counties need to be held accountable for permitting building in fire-prone locations. That sweet, sweet tax revenue isn't worth anybody's life.
Who said anything about stopping a fire, that's impossible , structures can be designed to survive & water will enable them to withstand the fire front attack for the critical ~1/2 hour. It's not my plan , it's our national building code for building in fire prone areas. After a catastrophe we change things within reason to try & prevent them from happening again, it works much better than hopes & prayers.If your plan relies on water to stop a fire, your plan isn't very good at all.
A hole lot better.Better than nothing I guess.
Thinks it other way around, but then its been 25 years since anyone i know has worked on emYou can tell when you see several bad cases of cabin fever, better call the CDC
Are they shingles when sawn and shakes when split? Seems I recall and oldtimer saying that is how it was. Damn shame they burn so readily because they sure do make beautiful roofing and last a really long time too compared to most the stuff put on today.
Thinks it other way around, but then its been 25 years since anyone i know has worked on em
Enter your email address to join: