Kneejerk Bombas
ArboristSite King
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Messages
- 36,971
- Reaction score
- 9,983
I somehow do not think your reasoning would hold up in a court of law. Its all about due diligence, and if the individual did not do everything in their power to indicate something was about to come crashing down, including a vocal or other audible warning(other than a saw), the repercussions could be considerable, and in favour of the person that was hit. I can see it now, "Judge I did not bother to shout, whistle whatever because Billy Bob would not hear me anyways" The climber is also most certainly responsible for the safety of his fellow workers just as the ground workers are for that of the climber, not exclusively so, but all on the hook none the less.
If I were to do everything in my power, I would erect a steel fence with razor wire on top, around the tree, come down before each cut and tap each groundman within the fence, on the shoulder, and have him sign a waiver, in front of a witness, indicating he knew I was about to cut a limb, and then go up back up...
Again, voice commands are useless, given they come from 60 feet in the air, with a chipper roaring, a pony motor racing, a chainsaw or two reving, and all ground crew wearing approved hearing protection.
What are you suggesting a court would say?
I'd be much more concerned about what the court would say about a crew dependent AT ALL on voice commands in the given circumstances!