mikefunaro
Addicted to ArboristSite
I never said anything about a "defect".
No defect. If you don't see it then we're just not on the same page. I've looked at like 6 of them now and they all have it and none didn't.
I never said anything about a "defect".
what kind of lens is that that enables you to take photos that close up of things?
Here--the plastic on this ridge. I have checked it on multiple 346's...the plastic sits out slightly too far on the outside and doesn't fully cover the metal outcropping on the inside...
Not obsessive or anything, i swear...LOL...
No defect. If you don't see it then we're just not on the same page. I've looked at like 6 of them now and they all have it and none didn't.
The best all terrain, all around general purpose chainsaw IN THE WOoooRLD.
And I still can't figure out how to copy and paste the link so that the picture appear.
i give up.
oregone, thanks for the photos ! tried to rep you but i have to spread it.
My point certainly wasn't to complain; I'm generally very pleased with the fit and finish on all of the saws I own. My point was just that even the best are imperfect. I guess the efco's are significantly worse than the husky, but if you look hard enough, you'll find things wrong everywhere.
Just this week someone put a nice ding in my car door...arghh!
why are you posting pics with my saw ?
Pictures are great.
You have a big Dolmar, or rather a Makita in blue there. Is that the 64cc?
How does it compare with the 346 in terms of handling feel and power?
Get some more fuel through that 346. I still has some "waking up" to do. Mine took around 8-10 tanks to really come alive. Congrats on a really fine saw purchace!
:hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange:
That's funny.
You caught me...I thought at first that you meant "the PICTURE of my saw"
I thought "shoot! did I actually picked the count's picture and post it instead of mine???
Felt very stupid
Then I recognized the blue tarp of our pool behind and realized you had me...that's what made me laugh. You really had me for a second.
Everyone has their reasons for liking one saw over another. I tend to like designs that are more simple with less clutter and easier to work on. Im not really old school but I dont like things that are not necessary. Im sure the 346 isnt too bad to take apart but I just dont like the way its laid out under the hood.
I know you like comparing things but its like when I bought my 01 SS camaro it had a lot of clutter under the hood so I removed all the emissions crap and it made a much better looking bay. Pistols I like glock cause its a genius design but is very basic and easy to work on and very reliable. Not bashing the 346 tho cause it looks like a very nice saw and should last you many years.
:msp_w00t:
That's why I love these conversations. What you say is very relevant and I completely get it. A good tool is one that is reduced to only what it needs in order to operate, everything else should be removed. In this lawyer's world (emissions, safety, etc...) there is always a bunch of unecessary clutter that adds weight and more things that can go wrong, not to mention overzealous engineers that always add and never remove (I know, I am one of those guy and even if I fight it, technology races always demands more junk)
I found the carburator guts of the 346XP not too busy but I am sure they have a couple extra hose and reflows, etc..that are not that necessary (it's emission regulation that adds that crap).
For the Glock, you must be a guy that likes to take things apart. Can't beat the glock for that unless you can deal with a revolver, that's even simpler than a Glock.
Me I don't care too much for the square barrel cover design. I think they should have rounded it. I love the dan Wesson 1911 bobtail, it's a beautiful gun.
I tried a bunch of guns and you know what I had the best fun with?...a long barrel 22. You get a browning and put a green laser scope on it for the heck of it (no need to aim with the slots but you do have to calibrate the laser). At the range, it's the funnest thing to use if you like precision, well, for a gun at least, no gun is really precise past 50 yards unless it's a long barrel with small bore.
The 1911 Colt 45 , man that thing is like a cannon but the bullet seeems to travel just like a cannon ball too, wherever it wants, even when using a sand bag. I could not get it to shoot where I wanted unles it was below 20 yards. For close range only, a defense weapon for destruction, nasty little tool.
OK, enough talking for me..I passed the 25000 word limit, sorry.
Hey, maybe you'll like to see a picture of another kind of toy.
I hope this is allowed.
View attachment 173240
From an engineer standpoint (I design machines for a living in R&D),
Efco is nothing like the 346XP in terms of fit and finish. I don't understand it. The way the plastic parts are designed and molded... I guess they have the innards down pat but in my experience, the way parts on designed on the outside, the way they fit together and look is often a reflection of the spirit in which the innards have been designed too.
Enter your email address to join: