The Meat of SRT thread...whatsup?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

NickfromWI

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Oct 14, 2002
Messages
2,035
Reaction score
24
Location
Los Angeles
Hey guys and Lauren and Che, have any of you tried posting on the "Let's get to the Meat of SRT" thread. Every time I try, it won't let me do it. I type the response, then hit the submit button, and the website doesn't submit:mad: It shows the "cannot find server" page that internet explorer show when you try to open a website that doesn't exist.

FWIW, murph, here's a copy of the email I got a long while back from Petzl...

attachment.php


love
nick
 
So I emailed Mr. Todd back explaining how we set the line from the ground.....here's the email I sent him..
----------------------------------------
Mr. Todd. I emailed you with a question a while ago about the potential hazards of side-loading carabiners. Thank you for your immediate response I still have some questions. I will refresh you because it's been over a month now! I was inquiring about attaching a carabiner to the end of a rope, Wrapping this carabiner/line around a brach, then clipping that carabiner back to the line itself, choking the line with the carabiner.

Your solution was to just attach a sling to the branch and clip the
carabiner to that. I am not a rigging expert, but I know enough about rope and rigging to know that there is no doubt that your solution is a better setup, but there are other things to consider here.

Among other things, I am an arborist. It is in the trees where I'd want to use this setup. The rope is installed in the tree without ever leaving the ground by throwing a weigthed throwline over a branch, then attaching the climbing line to the throwline and using the throwline to haul the climbing line into position. This will usually leave a line doubled over the branch. Now we can attach a prussik sling over both ends of this doubled rope and
ascend into the tree. Now say you have a 120' rope. This would allow you to tie in at 60' (since the rope is doubled over). If you throw your throwline in at a branch 70' up, you cannot ascend using this normal technique. The rope would be dangling ten feet above the air!

Your solution of affixing a sling first to the branch then clipping to
that would not work. It requires you to be in the tree to set it up.

To remedy the short doubled rope, we can cilmb the single line. Tie a running knot (a figure eight or a bowline) and put the tail of the rope in the knot and run it up....VIOLA! You now can climb a tree to any height up to 120' (minus the little bit of rope it takes to tie the knot).

We (me and my arborist/tree climbing buddies) want to know if, instead of a knot, can we clip a carabiner to the line, as shown in the picture. I know that this is improper. But what I want to know is, is it a matter of bad form, or is it a matter of life and death? Are the aluminum carabiner that many of us use delicate enough that a human being could break one apart while climbing on a line/carabiner setup I've described.

Please note that there is not a real "side load" on the carabiner. The spliced eye is hanging on one end of the spine, and the running end of the climbing line hangs over the spines other end. There is a bit of tweaked pull going on, but not something pulling straight down on the spine (pulling the spine away from the gate).

It seems it's a matter of what forces a person would create while
ascending and if this supercedes the strength of the carabiner.

Do you have evidence (testing or field reports) that shows this is
unsafe as well as improper?

Thank you for all your help!

love
nick

-----------------------------------------------------

Here's the reply I got....

-----------------------------------

Nick,
Unequivocally, I cannot recommend using this method. Your best bet
would be to consult a training organization such as Arbormaster:

www.arbormaster.com

Best Regards,
Blane C. Todd
--------------------------------------

Hmmm, why didn't we just ask Rip?!

love
nick
 
I seriously doubt that even a 400 lb. person climbing up the line that way would cause the carabiner to fail. If it did, the carabiner was defective to begin with. Petzl, for liability reasons, cannot condone using the carabiner in that manner, although it would be completely safe, IMHO. JFYI, I do just that quite often.
 
I didn't expect them to say, "Sure, sounds good to us!" But I would like to have heard them say, "In our testing, the average carabiner can only sustain X% of it's strength when pulled in a manner similar to what you describe.

I expected more than just, "I cannot condone this use."

AS needs to build a rope and tree strength research facility.

love
nick
 
That's terrible! I can't believe they wouldn't have a liitle better answer than: I can not condone this.
I thought companys like Petzl spent excessive amounts of money on research. For what: to evade custome inquirys: I guess.
 
Petzl gear is not made for tree work... we are borrowing the gear from rock climbers and cavers etc.. So it is reasonable to think that they amy not know the answer and in a big organization like that you might have to make several inquiries before you talk to the right person...
I'd be patient and accept their answer that it is an improper use for their gear, even though we all already knew that.
 
Daniel wrote:

Petzl gear is not made for tree work... we are borrowing the gear from rock climbers and cavers etc.

That is very true but Petzl is very interested in the use of their gear by arbos. We have become a bigger part of their bottom line. They do have large booths at tradeshows too.

I can understand their reluctance to give any more detailed answer than the did though.

Tom
 
I have a question, if Petzl gear isn't intended for tree work then why do they have illustations in their catalog on how to use their gear for single line work in a tree? At one time Petzl did not intend us using their pruducts but they are now well aware of us using it.
 
On page 17 of the Petzl professional catalog from 2002 there is an illustration of a man rapping out of a tree on an I'd and his rope is choked around a tree with a CARABINER. This is in the TREE SURGERY section of the "professional techniques for work." So I'd say that this was not an oversight in the catalog. Petzl puts alot of time and thought into those illustrations so my reply to the Petzl rep would be to look at his own publications.
 
Good followup, Nick

Why use a screw link at all when we all know a triple lock steel caribiner will unquestionably handle our weight and whatever extra Newtons of force we give it via the bounce, with whatever lateral forces your bodyweight can put to it. You can argue it, debate it and go round and round, but just because Petzl says "Don't sideload a caribiner" (because they have to say that...) does not necessarily mean it is a dangerous or unacceptable practice to choker a limb in a tree. Besides, Petzl illustrates 'sideloading' with the sharp edge of a rock pressing laterally against the mid spine of the biner. That WOULD be a stupid use of a caribiner, but this sort of thing, realistically, does not happen in a tree the way Petzl illustrates and recommends it to not be done.

I use spliced-end ropes and lower limbs by chokering the limb and clipping the biner back to the running end - the same as technique 'a la Nick', only applied differently. After many years of doing this and having lowered literally thousands of limbs, I have yet to sideload a biner to the point of breaking it, bending it or even malforming the gate sheath. The forces here are way beyond what I could put it through by just my own weight.

For the record, the biners I use for lowering limbs I do not use for climbing. Also, whenever I do the Nick method or do an SRT anchor to the base of the tree, I prefer to use two biners, at least one of them steel locking, directed opposite, and gates opposed. I am unquestionably confident in the safety of this. -TM-
 
When I first started out, SRTing everything, I would use a steel screw gate (65kn) for the SRT anchor.

I would make a wrap, come back with the biner end and make a half hitch with the load side of the line, and go back around the tree and then clip it to the line. I might post a pic tomorrow.

Why not just test some biners independently and see what the outcomes are?


Any deformation would be unacceptable. I am reasonably sure that a steel auto locker would take it no problem.

If you are in the tree and can reach the TIP, a coupla wraps around the limb (not when it is cut tho, as in lowering) can decrease the load (and also the side load) that the biner exsperiances.
 
Originally posted by NickfromWI

Your solution of affixing a sling first to the branch then clipping to
that would not work. It requires you to be in the tree to set it up.


This is not true, Nick, and you know it.


Originally posted by Tree Machine


After many years of doing this and having lowered literally thousands of limbs, I have yet to sideload a biner to the point of breaking it, bending it or even malforming the gate sheath.

Well said TM, like the drunk who drives home wasted every day and has never crashed, it's gotta be safe.:rolleyes:

Originally posted by Todd Blaine

Nick,
Unequivocally, I cannot recommend using this method. Your best bet
would be to consult a training organization such as Arbormaster:

www.arbormaster.com

Best Regards,
Blane C. Todd
--------------------------------------

Don't use this method, and get some training. My suggestion too!
Originally posted by NickfromWI


Hmmm, why didn't we just ask Rip?!

love
nick

You are looking for somebody to tell you that no matter how you side load a carabiner, it's strength will not be reduced to 5400 pounds. It ain't going to happen!
 
Back
Top