Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Kensie - Take care with the AF in that one, those are becoming hard to find and the price keeps going up.

PP 655BP is still on my wish list, as though I needed another saw...

Mark
You weren't joking! $50+ it's just as cheap to buy a parts Saw that still has the filter in it...
 
Certainly you could write a book on the issue of spit back in two stroke engine, I will let Steve cover the other topic.

In a nutshell, most of the time when we see spit back or the results of it and it is objectionable, it is a result of either reed valves not closing/sealing properly, or a piston ported engine with a worn piston/cylinder. If the reeds or piston don't seal, some of the charge in the crankcase will be ejected back out the intake.

Eccentric wrote a nice dissertation on the subject one time discussing the length of the intake tract and the impact on the momentum of the air moving through the carburetor and noted that it was a common misconception that reed valve engines were more likely to suffer from spit back problems.

McCulloch attacked it a bit differently, rather than adjust the length of the intake tract to try and minimize spit back, they installed some form of "spit back shields" or "collectors" on many saws to try and collect the fuel and direct it back to the intake. The covers over the carburetor inlet on the 10 Series saws is one example (early models didn't have this feature) and the collector and hose on many large frame saws was another way to try and capture the fuel and get it back into the intake system.

If you open the air box and the AF is soaked with fuel or the interior is dripping wet with fuel, spit back is probably excessive.

Older 10 Series McCulloch with no spit back shield (custom fuel line came with the saw...)

207.jpg

Later model 10 Series with a spit back shield

DSC05106.JPG

Large frame McCulloch saw with collector, that plastic box behind the inlet to the carburetor is supposed to have a foam insert, the hose from the bottom connects to the carburetor to allow the collected spit back to be introduced back into the intake to be burned.

DSCN5993.JPG

Mark
 
Certainly you could write a book on the issue of spit back in two stroke engine, I will let Steve cover the other topic.

In a nutshell, most of the time when we see spit back or the results of it and it is objectionable, it is a result of either reed valves not closing/sealing properly, or a piston ported engine with a worn piston/cylinder. If the reeds or piston don't seal, some of the charge in the crankcase will be ejected back out the intake.

Eccentric wrote a nice dissertation on the subject one time discussing the length of the intake tract and the impact on the momentum of the air moving through the carburetor and noted that it was a common misconception that reed valve engines were more likely to suffer from spit back problems.

McCulloch attacked it a bit differently, rather than adjust the length of the intake tract to try and minimize spit back, they installed some form of "spit back shields" or "collectors" on many saws to try and collect the fuel and direct it back to the intake. The covers over the carburetor inlet on the 10 Series saws is one example (early models didn't have this feature) and the collector and hose on many large frame saws was another way to try and capture the fuel and get it back into the intake system.

If you open the air box and the AF is soaked with fuel or the interior is dripping wet with fuel, spit back is probably excessive.

Older 10 Series McCulloch with no spit back shield (custom fuel line came with the saw...)

View attachment 599168

Later model 10 Series with a spit back shield

View attachment 599169

Large frame McCulloch saw with collector, that plastic box behind the inlet to the carburetor is supposed to have a foam insert, the hose from the bottom connects to the carburetor to allow the collected spit back to be introduced back into the intake to be burned.

View attachment 599171

Mark
Beautifully written, that helped out a lot, and that's also why the Mac 10-10 filter element I have had the split rubber piece directly over the carb instead of part of the filter, it's so the spitback doesn't soak the element correct?
IMG_8034.PNG
 
And one more question while I have you here, the right hand starter covers, I noticed it has the hex head bolt/nut holder for a bucking spike but the hole isn't fully drilled, is this so you can finish drilling out the hole to add a bucking spike later?
 
Yes on that 10 Series AF, in essence you have the spit back shield built into the AF rather than being a separate piece.

Also yes on the clutch covers, the hex is there to hold the head of the screw that attaches the spike, you can punch it out or drill it out and add the spike if you wish.

Mark
Awesome! Good to know!
 
Remember that the early 10 Series saws have a different bolt pattern and so have a different spike that the later PM and 600 Series saws.

Early

DSC02960.JPG

or

DSC02965.JPG

DSC02966.JPG

For the later saws, PM models with the long clutch cover that also covers the muffler and for 600 Series saws the spike is different and much more common. It won't fit the short clutch covers.

DSC02964.JPG

Mark
 
Shoot, that's not looking hopeful with my mac 250 and that excessive spitback. Really don't care to tear it down that far, but perhaps I will find another saw this weekend to distract me for the meantime.;) Is a 10 series too much to ask? Also have to order a new carb for my ms361. Something is still up with it, and it's definitely carb related, something I cannot determine for sure. Weekend is already filling up even before it comes. Got 3-4 lawns to mow, and I want to hang out with a friend and the family obviously.
 
Guess I wouldn't mind a husky large mount either as I have that 16'' bar I have no use for currently. That would be absolutely perfect on a 50cc+ saw.
 
Remember that the early 10 Series saws have a different bolt pattern and so have a different spike that the later PM and 600 Series saws.

Early

View attachment 599191

or

View attachment 599192

View attachment 599193

For the later saws, PM models with the long clutch cover that also covers the muffler and for 600 Series saws the spike is different and much more common. It won't fit the short clutch covers.

View attachment 599194

Mark
Awesome! Thanks for that I sure would have bought the wrong one!
 
dbb4e2b8effe2167e607841116d12931.jpg

Speaking of the fuel mix problem...Poulan apparently solved it all for us.... why not have both...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top