Why.
Why.
Shame you don't get an exercise! I split by hand too, but not that much by any means. I've never tried one of those big beasts as I usually try to stick with tools I can swing fast. Do you usually get a split every swing? It would seem like wasted swings would be wasting more energy than I'd have to spare. Still, if it splits the nasty stuff without going to the wedge it would save a lot of time.I have one of those 12 or 15 pound mauls. Im not sure of the weight. It is one of those with the steel handle. I split 40+ chords of wood by hand a year. That maul is 6 years old. If it dies I will buy another one to replace it. It has split some of the nastiest wood on the face of the earth.
And there's a reason for that too. Let me geek out for a moment: The equation for kinetic energy is <img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/1/4/4140f53f66a68e92afec2389ba289e25.png" width="94" height="25" alt="E_k =\tfrac{1}{2} mv^2" /> , where m is mass and v is velocity.It seems speed of the blade hitting the wood is more effective than heavy slow energy.
And there's a reason for that too. Let me geek out for a moment: The equation for kinetic energy is <img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/1/4/4140f53f66a68e92afec2389ba289e25.png" width="94" height="25" alt="E_k =\tfrac{1}{2} mv^2" /> , where m is mass and v is velocity.
So if you double the mass you double the energy of the hit, but if you double the speed you swing it you quadruple the energy. So I try to use the largest axe head I can swing fast.
Bought one years ago before they got so expensive. Love it as much as my saw, but not sure at today's prices that I would take the plunge.Ron
Bought one years ago before they got so expensive. Love it as much as my saw, but not sure at today's prices that I would take the plunge.Ron