i think it is logical that the path diversion by linebacker block would change things as so much of the downward force would be tied up it the fight to stay on path against the sideways hit? But you'd have to catch their C.o.B. right for best push? i'd think that the downward force would be 'taxed' to match the hit, and the downward force would not be at an efficient angle for just a minimal match of force by down? But then not maximum angle for diversion by hit either, as well?
Then, any part of the downward moving body's force that had been misdirected after that, would compound all that by seperately making an indirect hit with ground? As 2 seperate functions to be assessed?
In "Putting out on the Side" thread , i tried to show that any push/pull (linebacker hit/ tapered hinge fibers) to the side of the movement had a cost on the fall's force because of the cost of maintaining the direction of a fall. And any indirect impact with ground as a seperate componenet. Also, if i can get a hinge to pull to the side on a branch right at tear off, even if it doesn't seem to change the direction any, i think it like disturbs a % if the 'internal inertia'; that gives a lil war inside 'destabilizing direction' a lil, for somewhat as an indiretct hit. Partial proof is that branch,stob,log is more likely to roll, deflect in direction of final pull at tearoff once hitting ground IMLHO; saving lilies, sprinkler heads, giving extra frogiveness level to calculation of drop etc.
So i think that linebacker hit could help, but risk of secondary injury and lack of reaction time kinda mute it out. Perhaps if you were standing right there and someone fell from ladder or roof... i see it more from apples falling from trees than classroom fer sure; don't we deal with falling bodies all of the time?
So, i'll continue to use the pushes/pulls to side of falling force as an aid to clipping potential force and it's direction for damage potential rating from fall; but prolly with saw, not scrawny lil'butt!
Hitting an electrically charged person to knock away is higher chance of helping, and reduced chance of self injury if you hit them while you're not grounded (physically or eletrically)?
Never understood elevator thingy, seems like their would be more cleanup detail, if you were in the air when car hit bottom and continued to move at floor at same velocity after floor had stopped abruptly. i kinda doubt upward jump would be possible, let alone appreciable at that kinda free fall.... On floor, you would slow down with floor? Hanging on to hand rail scooched low, causing it to shear (if ya could) seems like best way to dispense with some force to me, then roll. But with all that timing and force, prolly a mute point too for most!
Here is a fell with an inter-arresting situation by "Standing Against All Odds" . Trees are the largest living organisms to ever wander our Earth, larger than the dinosaur's, to a totally different scale than to wee ants to these matchsticks.
Orrrrrrrrr something like that!
:alien:
Then, any part of the downward moving body's force that had been misdirected after that, would compound all that by seperately making an indirect hit with ground? As 2 seperate functions to be assessed?
In "Putting out on the Side" thread , i tried to show that any push/pull (linebacker hit/ tapered hinge fibers) to the side of the movement had a cost on the fall's force because of the cost of maintaining the direction of a fall. And any indirect impact with ground as a seperate componenet. Also, if i can get a hinge to pull to the side on a branch right at tear off, even if it doesn't seem to change the direction any, i think it like disturbs a % if the 'internal inertia'; that gives a lil war inside 'destabilizing direction' a lil, for somewhat as an indiretct hit. Partial proof is that branch,stob,log is more likely to roll, deflect in direction of final pull at tearoff once hitting ground IMLHO; saving lilies, sprinkler heads, giving extra frogiveness level to calculation of drop etc.
So i think that linebacker hit could help, but risk of secondary injury and lack of reaction time kinda mute it out. Perhaps if you were standing right there and someone fell from ladder or roof... i see it more from apples falling from trees than classroom fer sure; don't we deal with falling bodies all of the time?
So, i'll continue to use the pushes/pulls to side of falling force as an aid to clipping potential force and it's direction for damage potential rating from fall; but prolly with saw, not scrawny lil'butt!
Hitting an electrically charged person to knock away is higher chance of helping, and reduced chance of self injury if you hit them while you're not grounded (physically or eletrically)? Never understood elevator thingy, seems like their would be more cleanup detail, if you were in the air when car hit bottom and continued to move at floor at same velocity after floor had stopped abruptly. i kinda doubt upward jump would be possible, let alone appreciable at that kinda free fall.... On floor, you would slow down with floor? Hanging on to hand rail scooched low, causing it to shear (if ya could) seems like best way to dispense with some force to me, then roll. But with all that timing and force, prolly a mute point too for most!
Here is a fell with an inter-arresting situation by "Standing Against All Odds" . Trees are the largest living organisms to ever wander our Earth, larger than the dinosaur's, to a totally different scale than to wee ants to these matchsticks.
Orrrrrrrrr something like that!
:alien:
Last edited:
