Which 60cc saw

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Let us know how you like the 590. That seems to be the best bang for your buck out there. thats also a thought of mine, $400 for a brand new saw vs $370 for the used 361. just was concerned if the echo has enough power in stock form.
I got mine new in the box 340$, although the warranty does not apply because of eBay, I don't care because I might do a muffler mod and I work on my own stuff. I tried it out today on a 18" piece of ash log and I could lean on it pretty damn hard, it's got nice torque and balls. For 250$+ less than a husky 555 it's a damn good deal. I demoed a 555 and from what I remember it definitely was not as torquey as the 590.
 
...
Currently, the only 60cc saws that are lighter than the 562xp is the 560xp and 2260 (the 560 and ounce or two lighter - the usual Husky/Jred difference).
Sorry but this is not correct. The Oleo Mac 962 (which is by the way a 61.5cc saw) weighs less than the 562 but more than the 560. I know old school etc. but it is still manufactured and sold new today.

7
 
IMHO, the MS361 is the best 60cc saw ever, at least after mods.

So would an 036 do? After the mods? I know other builders loved them. It handles WAY better than a big boxy 362 box of manure does.........

Do you consider a 361 that much better than a 036? I take that 036 into the woods, then a 038M, then my 066 0r 056M.
 
I got mine new in the box 340$, although the warranty does not apply because of eBay, I don't care because I might do a muffler mod and I work on my own stuff. I tried it out today on a 18" piece of ash log and I could lean on it pretty damn hard, it's got nice torque and balls. For 250$+ less than a husky 555 it's a damn good deal. I demoed a 555 and from what I remember it definitely was not as torquey as the 590.

I see you joined the club. Kinda surprised. You will be glad you did.
 
I was suprised by the echo, for the money it's damn good deal
For people to dismiss these. Echo's would be silliness. One reason people complain about weight is just because their wallet still has some weight to it after you buy this saw. So saw weight plus all that saved cash weight really adds up and boggs some guy's down.
 
So would an 036 do? After the mods? I know other builders loved them. It handles WAY better than a big boxy 362 box of manure does.........

Do you consider a 361 that much better than a 036? I take that 036 into the woods, then a 038M, then my 066 0r 056M.

Only real 'problem' with the stock 036 is the clutch drum/bearing that were recalled/upgraded to the beefier 360 kit. Without the upgreade they are prone to grenade. The smaller clutch drum/bearing from the 036 is an upgrade for the 290/310/390 saws though, and I have swapped them over to get rim drives on those saws.

As for the 361 vs. the 036/360? Depends on what you define as better. 036 has more stock torque and a tad more power (rated and real), is far easier and faster to tune, and the early model did not need any mods because the stock muffler was wide open. The vibration is considerably higher on the 036/360 with he rubber AV mounts than the spring mounted 361. The 361 revs higher and has less torque to get the similar power. Open the muffler on the 361 (shark gill or StihlBilly mod) and you re-gain the 'lost' EPA power. The 036 has screw-in oil and gas caps which I prefer over flippy caps. The 361 has quad ports, which is a definite improvement. The 361 is more prone to flooding if you do not know how to start them. I never use the decomp starting a cold 361. The PRO 036 has a decomp, the non-PRO does not (the only real difference between them). The oil pumps have the exact same outputs on the stock 036/360/361/362 saws. The 361/2 saws can be upgraded with the 460 and 460R oil pumps to get higher outputs, but the 036/360 pumps cannot. The owners manuals on the 036/360 say that a 20 inch bar is the limit, but the same output 361/2 saw manuals say a 25 inch bar is the limit. I have run a 25 on the 036 and the 361 with no problem. They weigh about the same and they are both slim model saws.

So its torque vs RPM, higher vibe rubber vs low vibe springs, clutch bearing mod vs. muffler mod, screw-in caps vs flippy caps. Having owned and run both, I would say that they are a dead heat overall. I prefer lower vibe saws and tend toward higher revving ones. I also prefer screw-in caps and easy to start and tune saws though.
 
Only real 'problem' with the stock 036 is the clutch drum/bearing that were recalled/upgraded to the beefier 360 kit. Without the upgreade they are prone to grenade. The smaller clutch drum/bearing from the 036 is an upgrade for the 290/310/390 saws though, and I have swapped them over to get rim drives on those saws.

As for the 361 vs. the 036/360? Depends on what you define as better. 036 has more stock torque and a tad more power (rated and real), is far easier and faster to tune, and the early model did not need any mods because the stock muffler was wide open. The vibration is considerably higher on the 036/360 with he rubber AV mounts than the spring mounted 361. The 361 revs higher and has less torque to get the similar power. Open the muffler on the 361 (shark gill or StihlBilly mod) and you re-gain the 'lost' EPA power. The 036 has screw-in oil and gas caps which I prefer over flippy caps. The 361 has quad ports, which is a definite improvement. The 361 is more prone to flooding if you do not know how to start them. I never use the decomp starting a cold 361. The PRO 036 has a decomp, the non-PRO does not (the only real difference between them). The oil pumps have the exact same outputs on the stock 036/360/361/362 saws. The 361/2 saws can be upgraded with the 460 and 460R oil pumps to get higher outputs, but the 036/360 pumps cannot. The owners manuals on the 036/360 say that a 20 inch bar is the limit, but the same output 361/2 saw manuals say a 25 inch bar is the limit. I have run a 25 on the 036 and the 361 with no problem. They weigh about the same and they are both slim model saws.

So its torque vs RPM, higher vibe rubber vs low vibe springs, clutch bearing mod vs. muffler mod, screw-in caps vs flippy caps. Having owned and run both, I would say that they are a dead heat overall. I prefer lower vibe saws and tend toward higher revving ones. I also prefer screw-in caps and easy to start and tune saws though.


Nice, quality post reflecting your vast knowledge base, THANKS!
 
The Echo is a fine saw. Both the Dolmar 6100 and Echo 590/600 are the size and weight of a 70cc saw. However they're more affordable high quality options.

The weights are close but not the same. As you know, the thing that makes the 590/600/620 so interesting (besides price) is how they respond to a simple (15 min.) MM and tune. For guys willing to do such a mod with the Echo, you will have a saw that cuts like a 70cc but weighs significantly less (ready to cut). IMO, all three saws below would have similar cutting performance:

Echo 600p____PHO: 13 lb - 7 oz.____Fuel: 21.8 oz.____Oil: 10.1 oz.____TTL Weight: 15.43 lbs.____Price: $450 (Ebay)
Husky 372xp__PHO: 14 lb - 3.5 oz.___Fuel: 26.04 oz.___Oil: 13.53 oz.___TTL Weight: 16.69 lbs.____Price: $879.95
Stihl ms441___PHO: 15 lb - 1 oz.____Fuel: 24.5 oz.____Oil: 12.2 oz.____TTL Weight: 17.36 lbs.____Price: $950

Now if you port the 600p for $300 + $450 = $750: You will have a saw that costs much less and will out cut the other two any day of the week. Yes, it's not fair to compare a ported saw to a stock or MM'd saw. My point is, for $750, you will have a saw that will bury the other two. The fact that Echo is a quality built, simple, and reliable machine just adds to the value.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top