smokechase II
Addicted to ArboristSite
Notches and hingewood
"Smokechase sorry I didn't explain myself a little better there in my last post, I didn't mean for you or anyone else to blow a head gasket responding to it. Like I said earlier I could go on and on about notches and hingewood , but the way this thread was going I didn't think it was needed anyway, but it sure turned your light bulb on upstairs though eh?"
--------------
Sorry for the excitement.
But do go on about notches and hingewood.
Specifically:
Did you mean to say: 'Softwood trees support themselves primarily with compression wood. Hardwood trees primarily use tension wood for anchor support?'
I'm not sure if this is a simple grammar correction/omission or a philosophical wood matrix doctoral paper that is revolutionary and like Einstein’s theory of relativity, where there were no prior scholarly works to cite, hence it stands alone.
------------------
In any case your tree size experience fits well in my previous thesis in this thread that shallow faces are generally acceptable when there is less force to overcome. See post 59; slide two.
-----------------
In regard to weed eating and falling.
A 10 inch tree presents plenty of difficulty and threat to life span. So I regret others disparaging remarks about size mattering.
"Smokechase sorry I didn't explain myself a little better there in my last post, I didn't mean for you or anyone else to blow a head gasket responding to it. Like I said earlier I could go on and on about notches and hingewood , but the way this thread was going I didn't think it was needed anyway, but it sure turned your light bulb on upstairs though eh?"
--------------
Sorry for the excitement.
But do go on about notches and hingewood.
Specifically:
Did you mean to say: 'Softwood trees support themselves primarily with compression wood. Hardwood trees primarily use tension wood for anchor support?'
I'm not sure if this is a simple grammar correction/omission or a philosophical wood matrix doctoral paper that is revolutionary and like Einstein’s theory of relativity, where there were no prior scholarly works to cite, hence it stands alone.
------------------
In any case your tree size experience fits well in my previous thesis in this thread that shallow faces are generally acceptable when there is less force to overcome. See post 59; slide two.
-----------------
In regard to weed eating and falling.
A 10 inch tree presents plenty of difficulty and threat to life span. So I regret others disparaging remarks about size mattering.
:spam:
