Okay, that makes sense to me. I'm just trying to understand it well enough to avoid a post-machining Oh Crap situation.
Dave
Running great as always Will.
Those videos give me an incentive to dive into the guts of my saw. I'd love to be able to have that kind of performance for bucking big wood.
Looks like a good runner!! In the first vid the chain seemed a bit grabby. After that the chain cut fine untill that last cut, been there done that lol.
Gotta love the 372 oem or aftermarket, they just rock
Great job on the saw Will.
I got a bit antsy/bored and decided to make up some clay and check the area of the transfer ports on the BB kit. I did a bit of rounding off on some of the figures, but all in all the BB kit does have enough transfer port area to flow if the ports are completely open, that is, if the top of the piston is cut down to the bottom of the port.
The figures I got were for around .0066 (or a little more) at 10,500 rpm.
The carburetor size leaves me cold - only 17mm. I think I recall Al boring out the carb, or putting a 385 carb on that was bigger. Anybody have any ideas about swapping carbs on the 372?
I got a bit antsy/bored and decided to make up some clay and check the area of the transfer ports on the BB kit. I did a bit of rounding off on some of the figures, but all in all the BB kit does have enough transfer port area to flow if the ports are completely open, that is, if the top of the piston is cut down to the bottom of the port.
The figures I got were for around .0066 (or a little more) at 10,500 rpm.
The carburetor size leaves me cold - only 17mm. I think I recall Al boring out the carb, or putting a 385 carb on that was bigger. Anybody have any ideas about swapping carbs on the 372?
Thanks guys, I found the thread where Al bored out the carb. He opened it up 1.1mm at the venturi and didn't have any problems. - That's only another 6% larger than stock 365 carb, but it helps narrow the gap with the 18% increase in displacement. Too bad about the hassle with the 385 carb, it would have closed the gap a bit more.
Crikey, I misread Al's thread - he opened the carb up from a 16.7mm venturi to a 17.5mm venturi - that is a tad less than 5% increase in area. Too bad about the tilt on the 385 series carb, that could go to 19mm.
I may not need to bore the carb, I can order a 17.5mm carb from M&D. Here's a link to their listings for the carbs - http://www.m-and-d.com/pdfs/zama/C3A_M_PARTS_LIST.pdf
Perhaps the throttle valve is a bit bigger, which may allow a bit more boring of the venturi. I'll have to talk to the tech at Zama to get the throttle bore specs on the 17.5mm carb. If I do purchase a carb, this time I will order a complete selection of metering springs in order to help me set the POP. I should have done that when I got the bigger carb for the 450.
Too bad about the hassle with the 385 carb, it would have closed the gap a bit more.
I got a bit antsy/bored and decided to make up some clay and check the area of the transfer ports on the BB kit. I did a bit of rounding off on some of the figures, but all in all the BB kit does have enough transfer port area to flow if the ports are completely open, that is, if the top of the piston is cut down to the bottom of the port.
The figures I got were for around .0066 (or a little more) at 10,500 rpm.
You had to play with MUD to come to that conclusion Terry? :msp_w00t:
Enter your email address to join: