Sagetown
Farmer and a STIHL
So, you're saying, if it was tuned to that mix ratio, you might not have that issue?Can't tune an Autotune saw Brad.....my 201T isn't really an issue Stihl top handle clutch covers all turn black anyways
So, you're saying, if it was tuned to that mix ratio, you might not have that issue?Can't tune an Autotune saw Brad.....my 201T isn't really an issue Stihl top handle clutch covers all turn black anyways
I run 32:1 in everything, stock and ported. It's never been an issue.If you were getting that goo, would you lighten up on the oil??
I like that idea.I could also do the 660 and do 50:1 vs 32:1
Okay; Do you think the local Stihl Techs are capable of tuning them in for a 32:1 ratio?All our A/T and M/T saws run on 32:1. No drool.
Weedeaters and leafblowers too.
Which is why you guys get better gains out of say....a 346 than you do a 550, because they can be leaned out to the edge but yet stock for stock a 550 is a little stronger.This is true. Perhaps MTronic runs rich.
A ported 550 will nip right at the heals of a 346. I'm not saying MTronic runs rich. That was more of a question, or a possibility as to what you're seeing.Which is why you guys get better gains out of say....a 346 than you do a 550, because they can be leaned out to the edge but yet stock for stock a 550 is a little stronger.
well I can try 50:1 vs 32:1 and do the reset thingy on the 661 and see what happens. Someone gotta buy some of these chains though so I can keep this testing going.
I could also do the 660 and do 50:1 vs 32:1
Its possible. And i could've played with the tune on the 201T a little more but i didn't.A ported 550 will nip right at the heals of a 346. I'm not saying MTronic runs rich. That was more of a question, or a possibility as to what you're seeing.
Thats what Im saying. Too many variable in each cut to claim one ratio is faster than another. Proof would be a dyno.You're wasting your time young man.
More oil has been proven to make more power in tests that are far more scientific than anything you are doing here.
It would be a tough to do on a dyno even.Thats what Im saying. Too many variable in each cut to claim one ratio is faster than another. Proof would be a dyno.
What does that tell you besides don't use the crap?We're all just guessing in the dark here. The last though I have on this, is how goofy H1R behaves, I had to open up th H speed jet on my 346 almost a full turn, when I went from running K2. I've never had to do that running any other oil. A full turn would definitely be a lot for the Mtronic system to adjust in a timely manner. IMHO this really has little if anything to do with the oil fuel ratio itself. It simply doesn't add up, and is out of line with the years of timing saw and comparing them, at gtg's or on my own time.
Yes I believe so too.It would be a tough to do on a dyno even.
104Dl of RS in .404 @ .063 ................ what do you want for them ?well I can try 50:1 vs 32:1 and do the reset thingy on the 661 and see what happens. Someone gotta buy some of these chains though so I can keep this testing going.
I could also do the 660 and do 50:1 vs 32:1
Yes I believe so too.
How about this for a new test... why not pick one oil at one set ratio but vary the grades of gas. Do say 40:1 of your choice and mix 89, 91, 93 and then test it against some canned fuel...?
What does that tell you besides don't use the crap?
Enter your email address to join: