Moparmyway
Its just a saw
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,481
- Reaction score
- 3,399
Even when I post it ............. I am sure you will attempt to discount itI'd like to see a picture of that?
Fanks
Even when I post it ............. I am sure you will attempt to discount itI'd like to see a picture of that?
Fanks
If it doesn't turn up real soon & then it does later on, then we know you'll have a severe case of RSI! LOLEven when I post it ............. I am sure you will attempt to discount it
I will have it posted tomorrow when I get home ......... soon enough for ya ?If it doesn't turn up real soon & then it does later on, then we know you'll have a severe case of RSI! LOL
Tanzsk
Moparmyway Any idea how many chains to tanks of fuel ? I always mean to try keep track but never do . Would be cool to know
I said over 20 years .............. actually purchased in 1987 IIRC ........... could have been 86How did you estimate that number?
Just crunching a few numbers I come out with this, say 15 minutes for a litre of fuel,
1 hour equals 4 litres of fuel X 2000 hrs = 8000 litres of fuel used
20 years X 220 work days a year = 4400 days
8000 ltrs / 4400 days = 1.82 litres every work day a year for 20 years
Or 400 litres of fuel used a year
Or 16 litres of oil used a year at 25:1 ratio
First of all, motul isn't my pet oil . I am not that crazy about it. Second of all, the carbon layer was very thin and there was nothing erupting. Again, you don't know what your looking at.Is it just me, or is it a bit strange that you show one of your Pistons with a top caked in erupting flaking carbon with your pet oil & claim that it's ok, then beforehand someone shows a piston top with a non erupting or flaking carbon buildup of an oil you don't like & it's rubbish! How about a reasonable explaination for what seems to be a unreasonable bias?
Are you sure about that date? I was falling full time in the early nineties (91) & they weren't available then, 056 mags were the top dog in the stihl 90cc rangeI said over 20 years .............. actually purchased in 1987 IIRC ........... could have been 86
That doesn't seem like a reasonable explanation at all, the pictures tell the story though.First of all, motul isn't my pet oil . I am not that crazy about it. Second of all, the carbon layer was very thin and there was nothing erupting. Again, you don't know what your looking at.
If you had cast your net a little wider you would have caught my recent posts with pictures of a 090 I found in a rubbish throw out & some fence posts I was ripping with my ms660. I am a naturally skeptical of things that seem too good to be true & similarly so for those that get sucked by that stuff.I will have it posted tomorrow when I get home ......... soon enough for ya ?
On a side note, I have posted pics and videos as well as sent along anything and everything that I have said in any post ................ I have yet to see you post up anything in a video or pictures related to chainsaws that show you are more than just a keyboard hack ...............
Proove me wrong, post up something chainsaw related that you are working on, participate in a build off or chain race, give something chainsaw related to another member here who needs it, become more than just the troll that you have been as of late
You don't know what your looking at.. Very apparent to anyone that does.That doesn't seem like a reasonable explanation at all, the pictures tell the story though.
You are essentially calling the guy a liar. A guy who, unlike you actually contributes.If you had cast your net a little wider you would have caught my recent posts with pictures of a 090 I found in a rubbish throw out & some fence posts I was ripping with my ms660. I am a naturally skeptical of things that seem too good to be true & similarly so for those that get sucked by that stuff.
Thangst
What wasnt available then ?Are you sure about that date? I was falling full time in the early nineties (91) & they weren't available then, 056 mags were the top dog in the stihl 90cc range
I saw an old invoice book the other day with my dockets for log volumes from that year.
Fansk
Yeah, we get the point that you only live in your own reality and that if you didnt do it, or cant do it, nobody canI am a naturally skeptical of things that seem too good to be true & similarly so for those that get sucked by that stuff.
Thangst
You are essentially calling the guy a liar. A guy who, unlike you actually contributes.
He is proven wrong consistently. Unfortunately he isn't smart enough to shut up.Yeah, we get the point that you only live in your own reality and that if you didnt do it, or cant do it, nobody can
Thanks bwalker, like I already said, the picture he questions will easily be posted when I get home tomorrow. I want to see him worm his way into attempting to dismiss it as he typically tries to do when he is proven wrong ......................... again
And a couple more number to addHow did you estimate that number?
Just crunching a few numbers I come out with this, say 15 minutes for a litre of fuel,
1 hour equals 4 litres of fuel X 2000 hrs = 8000 litres of fuel used
20 years X 220 work days a year = 4400 days
8000 ltrs / 4400 days = 1.82 litres every work day a year for 20 years
Or 400 litres of fuel used a year
Or 16 litres of oil used a year at 25:1 ratio
I said over 20 years .............. actually purchased in 1987 IIRC ........... could have been 86
What wasnt available then ?
I am sure that I purchased my 2000 plus hour stumper in 86 or 87.
Its not my stumpin saw anymore, but it still runs just fine with the origional piston, rings, and cylinder.
you're essentially seem to being overly antagonistic & aggressive for......... a matter of opinion oil thread!You are essentially calling the guy a liar. A guy who, unlike you actually contributes.
Enter your email address to join: