jughead500
Sasquatch
oh yeah.ozzy vs Marilyn manson was killer.lolRemember the show on MTV called Celebrity Death Match.
oh yeah.ozzy vs Marilyn manson was killer.lolRemember the show on MTV called Celebrity Death Match.
First, we don't work for the sponsor's. Second, we are not being compensated by anyone at all to hold these positions. Third, we don't have any incentive to make anyone look good or bad (sponsor or normal member). The content that was removed was because personal information was being distributed and that is not allowed by the site. There's also little/no value in being accusatory with little/no supporting facts and so that stuff was deleted. It's also against site rules to argue with mods and as such @thomas1 posts were deleted. You and T1 seem to only want to stereotype me (and other mods) into a category of oversight that simply does not exist anymore instead of reading what is written and how we are conducting business currently. To some people like myself it just appears like your comments are off the wall and out of touch. I read what you guys post and don't see any evidence that supports it but maybe because I haven't been around long idk, but common, get over what ever the issue is and let your guard down, we're hear as a friend.A review system will never work here. As soon as the wrong site sponsor got a bad review, he'd just have the mods remove it. Look at how much stuff has disappeared in this thread, including this post shortly I would imagine. There would be no chance of a bad review of certain people staying up.
Only magic beans here.Anybody grow lima beans?
First, we don't work for the sponsor's. Second, we are not being compensated by anyone at all to hold these positions. Third, we don't have any incentive to make anyone look good or bad (sponsor or normal member). The content that was removed was because personal information was being distributed and that is not allowed by the site. There's also little/no value in being accusatory with little/no supporting facts and so that stuff was deleted. It's also against site rules to argue with mods and as such @thomas1 posts were deleted. You and T1 seem to only want to stereotype me (and other mods) into a category of oversight that simply does not exist anymore instead of reading what is written and how we are conducting business currently. To some people like myself it just appears like your comments are off the wall and it off touch. I read what you guys post and don't see any evidence that supports it but maybe because I haven't been around long idk but common, get over it and let your guard down, we're hear as a friend.
Why bother, Randy? It would seem that any post a moderator doesn't like get deleted, no matter what the content. Also, history has proven that as long as a sponsors account is paid up any posts that may be viewed negatively by them will be deleted.
There have been plenty of posts deleted from this thread already, do you really think that won't happen again? FFS, that's the major reason why. Those who are from history are doomed to repeat it.
I would venture to guess Marshy will delete this one, too. He seems to have an aversion to reality.
I have a "New Recipe " for thoseAnybody grow lima beans?
I scan this crap and I get, "Dumb," "Stupid," "Negative," "Delete," "the **** keeps happening," "too dumb to learn," sounds like a butthurt teenager which you would know moe about than me..... I'd have to google all that negativism for any preliminary understanding, but there's no spare time for it.
Marshy and SVK and TonyK...so on seem to bust ass equally, so don't get butthurt princess. We just want a decent site sans Polar bear poop.
I'll save it for you so everyone can see how retarded you are on the road of logic.....
Otherwise to quote retardation seems to have a slowing effect. lol
You must've been reading a different post than me, because I didn't see any of the 'crap' of which you are referring...I scan this crap and I get, "Dumb," "Stupid," "Negative," "Delete," "the **** keeps happening," "too dumb to learn," sounds like a butthurt teenager which you would know moe about than me..... I'd have to google all that negativism for any preliminary understanding, but there's no spare time for it.
If they post an add in the for sale section ,it would work ,without the add ,no feedback should be allowedThe more I think about it the more it makes sense to have something in each member's profile where you can make a review about any transaction. That way if people are selling/trading but ripping people off they can get held accountable for it. Something kind of like ebay where you choose 1-5 start reading in categories like communication, shipping, product description and overall satisfaction. Any written review (1) would have a limited amount of characters for a general description summary at the end of the rating. If someone choose a 1 start rating on the seller in a category maybe they can get another small comment section for that category but it will be short. And most importantly, it would seem fitting to allows the seller to comment on reviews that receive 2 starts or less.
Maybe you should try actually reading instead of just scanning?
Let me know how much things have changed in the past 5 years or if this exact scenario has played out over and over.
You must've been reading a different post than me, because I didn't see any of the 'crap' of which you are referring...
No time for that running four logging crew princess. And a mill with four kiln. When you get to my level you take one look and see if the guy is worth bringing to the stage.....
In his, "avatar," princess. Low self-esteem is best rooted out at the base like any disease.......
Maybe the key to being allowed to make the review is a valid posting from the trading Post if said item for sale? I don't know know if that is feasible but what I think you are getting at is you don't want anyone to make erroneous reviews, good or bad.If they post an add in the for sale section ,it would work ,without the add ,no feedback should be allowed
Brush Ape?
Correct ,if they have not been part of the transaction ,no comment should be allowed ,it will plug up the section with worthless banter .,one transaction ,one comment left on the transaction ,not open for everyone to chime in ,Maybe the key to being allowed to make the review is a valid posting from the trading Post if said item for sale? I don't know know if that is feasible but what I think you are getting at is you don't want anyone to make erroneous reviews, good or bad.
A review system will never work here. As soon as the wrong site sponsor got a bad review, he'd just have the mods remove it. Look at how much stuff has disappeared in this thread, including this post shortly I would imagine. There would be no chance of a bad review of certain people staying up.
spell out what the end p means,,as you know this bunch on here................................If anyone else has relevant info speak now or forever hold you p.
Enter your email address to join: