Anybody know how to get back in touch with Moody?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A review system will never work here. As soon as the wrong site sponsor got a bad review, he'd just have the mods remove it. Look at how much stuff has disappeared in this thread, including this post shortly I would imagine. There would be no chance of a bad review of certain people staying up.
First, we don't work for the sponsor's. Second, we are not being compensated by anyone at all to hold these positions. Third, we don't have any incentive to make anyone look good or bad (sponsor or normal member). The content that was removed was because personal information was being distributed and that is not allowed by the site. There's also little/no value in being accusatory with little/no supporting facts and so that stuff was deleted. It's also against site rules to argue with mods and as such @thomas1 posts were deleted. You and T1 seem to only want to stereotype me (and other mods) into a category of oversight that simply does not exist anymore instead of reading what is written and how we are conducting business currently. To some people like myself it just appears like your comments are off the wall and out of touch. I read what you guys post and don't see any evidence that supports it but maybe because I haven't been around long idk, but common, get over what ever the issue is and let your guard down, we're hear as a friend.
That's the last time in going to discuss that subject here. Let's talk about how we can better the site with service reviews.
 
A site sponsors tab under reviews would be all that is needed ,if you get work done ,and are happy or not happy ,leave it in the review ,if you can not handle waiting in line for certain builders ,you have the choice to find someone else,but don't ***** about it ,you knew ahead of time on that ,there is a reason those guys have a waiting list .
 
First, we don't work for the sponsor's. Second, we are not being compensated by anyone at all to hold these positions. Third, we don't have any incentive to make anyone look good or bad (sponsor or normal member). The content that was removed was because personal information was being distributed and that is not allowed by the site. There's also little/no value in being accusatory with little/no supporting facts and so that stuff was deleted. It's also against site rules to argue with mods and as such @thomas1 posts were deleted. You and T1 seem to only want to stereotype me (and other mods) into a category of oversight that simply does not exist anymore instead of reading what is written and how we are conducting business currently. To some people like myself it just appears like your comments are off the wall and it off touch. I read what you guys post and don't see any evidence that supports it but maybe because I haven't been around long idk but common, get over it and let your guard down, we're hear as a friend.

What's the difference between arguing and constructive dialog? Anyone that disagrees with you is arguing?

Just so I understand, your way of allowing people to have an open discussion and express their point of view is by deleting their posts? And just because you delete posts you don't agree with you don't want to be stereotyped as a person who would not present all the facts in a discussion. Is that correct?

If the shoe fits, wear it. I don't see pioneerguy or zippy or madhatte running around deleting a bunch of posts. Maybe there's a lesson to be learned, there?
 
Why bother, Randy? It would seem that any post a moderator doesn't like get deleted, no matter what the content. Also, history has proven that as long as a sponsors account is paid up any posts that may be viewed negatively by them will be deleted.

There have been plenty of posts deleted from this thread already, do you really think that won't happen again? FFS, that's the major reason why. Those who are from history are doomed to repeat it.

I would venture to guess Marshy will delete this one, too. He seems to have an aversion to reality.

I scan this crap and I get, "Dumb," "Stupid," "Negative," "Delete," "the **** keeps happening," "too dumb to learn," sounds like a butthurt teenager which you would know moe about than me..... I'd have to google all that negativism for any preliminary understanding, but there's no spare time for it.

Marshy and SVK and TonyK...so on seem to bust ass equally, so don't get butthurt princess. We just want a decent site sans Polar bear poop.

I'll save it for you so everyone can see how retarded you are on the road of logic.....

Otherwise to quote retardation seems to have a slowing effect. lol
 
The more I think about it the more it makes sense to have something in each member's profile where you can make a review about any transaction. That way if people are selling/trading but ripping people off they can get held accountable for it. Something kind of like ebay where you choose 1-5 start reading in categories like communication, shipping, product description and overall satisfaction. Any written review (1) would have a limited amount of characters for a general description summary at the end of the rating. If someone choose a 1 start rating on the seller in a category maybe they can get another small comment section for that category but it will be short. And most importantly, it would seem fitting to allows the seller to comment on reviews that receive 2 starts or less.
 
I scan this crap and I get, "Dumb," "Stupid," "Negative," "Delete," "the **** keeps happening," "too dumb to learn," sounds like a butthurt teenager which you would know moe about than me..... I'd have to google all that negativism for any preliminary understanding, but there's no spare time for it.

Marshy and SVK and TonyK...so on seem to bust ass equally, so don't get butthurt princess. We just want a decent site sans Polar bear poop.

I'll save it for you so everyone can see how retarded you are on the road of logic.....

Otherwise to quote retardation seems to have a slowing effect. lol

Maybe you should try actually reading instead of just scanning?

Let me know how much things have changed in the past 5 years or if this exact scenario has played out over and over.
 
I scan this crap and I get, "Dumb," "Stupid," "Negative," "Delete," "the **** keeps happening," "too dumb to learn," sounds like a butthurt teenager which you would know moe about than me..... I'd have to google all that negativism for any preliminary understanding, but there's no spare time for it.
You must've been reading a different post than me, because I didn't see any of the 'crap' of which you are referring...
 
The more I think about it the more it makes sense to have something in each member's profile where you can make a review about any transaction. That way if people are selling/trading but ripping people off they can get held accountable for it. Something kind of like ebay where you choose 1-5 start reading in categories like communication, shipping, product description and overall satisfaction. Any written review (1) would have a limited amount of characters for a general description summary at the end of the rating. If someone choose a 1 start rating on the seller in a category maybe they can get another small comment section for that category but it will be short. And most importantly, it would seem fitting to allows the seller to comment on reviews that receive 2 starts or less.
If they post an add in the for sale section ,it would work ,without the add ,no feedback should be allowed
 
Maybe you should try actually reading instead of just scanning?

Let me know how much things have changed in the past 5 years or if this exact scenario has played out over and over.

No time for that running four logging crew princess. And a mill with four kiln. When you get to my level you take one look and see if the guy is worth bringing to the stage.....

You must've been reading a different post than me, because I didn't see any of the 'crap' of which you are referring...

49499.jpg


In his, "avatar," princess. Low self-esteem is best rooted out at the base like any disease.......
 
No time for that running four logging crew princess. And a mill with four kiln. When you get to my level you take one look and see if the guy is worth bringing to the stage.....



49499.jpg


In his, "avatar," princess. Low self-esteem is best rooted out at the base like any disease.......

Brush Ape?

The logging crews must be very impressed to know that their boss spends most of his day calling grown men "princess" on the Internet.
 
If they post an add in the for sale section ,it would work ,without the add ,no feedback should be allowed
Maybe the key to being allowed to make the review is a valid posting from the trading Post if said item for sale? I don't know know if that is feasible but what I think you are getting at is you don't want anyone to make erroneous reviews, good or bad.
 
Brush Ape?

The one and only brotha from anotha motha qualified to bust your dumb ass five states away with both hands already managing profitable enterprise. Why in the sam schick mutterblatten grum fiss do you think I'm here, Princess.....?
 
Maybe the key to being allowed to make the review is a valid posting from the trading Post if said item for sale? I don't know know if that is feasible but what I think you are getting at is you don't want anyone to make erroneous reviews, good or bad.
Correct ,if they have not been part of the transaction ,no comment should be allowed ,it will plug up the section with worthless banter .,one transaction ,one comment left on the transaction ,not open for everyone to chime in ,
Example ,i buy a bar from you ,i pay with paypal ,i receive said part ,after i receive leave review or feedback on the transaction ,then people can read through the feedback like ebay and decide if they would want to to buy from you off of that .
As for the saw builders doing a service ,may have to be different ,because they do not run adds .
 
A review system will never work here. As soon as the wrong site sponsor got a bad review, he'd just have the mods remove it. Look at how much stuff has disappeared in this thread, including this post shortly I would imagine. There would be no chance of a bad review of certain people staying up.

A complimentary sack full of farts will be headed your way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top