Yes. It was made by mt Rainer Hydraulics, by my memory. It was a real machine.Wasn't it a guillotine?
N
Yes. It was made by mt Rainer Hydraulics, by my memory. It was a real machine.Wasn't it a guillotine?
Was limited to about 16", some users experienced cracking of the shear blade.
But it's another example where a slow splitter doesn't have to mean low or inefficient production.
There was something about the guys daughter or grand daughter or daughter in law or the like doing a number on him and the company having to fold.
What was the problem with the birch, crush it to much?One used to be around here. Didnt' work well on birch.
What was the problem with the birch, crush it to much?
The problem with the WR6 is the same for most of those European splitters. They are made for small, short wood. They have different types of wood and burn smaller lenghts than us Mericans. I wouldnt have a WR6 or a Splitta 400 the way they are built. Now grow one of those machines up and I might consider one.Judging by the Igland web site the WR6 is no longer offered.
Sadly, most of us on here dont have the market, money, or time to justify such a operation, but that doesnt stop us from wanting the biggest, baddest splitter money can buy.
Mud it is not often that something is better stated. You are exactly correct in this observation. Back in the 80's I signed a USDA contract on about 750 cords of wood like many contracts there are not stated or stipulations not originally agreed upon, but proceeded ahead anyway. The first year of the program went so so then the following year the lows were in the 40's and my biggest customer was in San Diego which was experiencing a consistent 70's. So I had wood that was cut ready to go, but no market. Then we had a couple of great years and prices were high, but was uncomfortable in investing $50,000 for extra inventory. Then I met another supplier who processed more wood than I could imagine. Up to 9,000 cords per year. So I worked for him a few years to actually pay my debts off. He had 50 people working full time at his project producing 50 cords a day. He told me over and over again how he had companies bring their processors to his site for demonstrations. Where as they all failed miserably. Especially live Oak is great wood, but very inconsistent. I attended a few processor demonstrations, but none that I have seen can go from a 60'' Pine with 16'' limbs to a 18'' Pine with out skipping a beat. So you need the right weather the right supply the right customers at the right time to justify spending from 30,000 to $100,000 in processing equipment. Thanks
I have seen videos of processors that use electric sensors to judge the size of the wood and adjust the splitting wedge for best size splits. So it can be done. I still think it would be hard to make every split the same size with any consistency.Sadly, most of us on here dont have the market, money, or time to justify such a operation, but that doesnt stop us from wanting the biggest, baddest splitter money can buy.
Mud it is not often that something is better stated. You are exactly correct in this observation. Back in the 80's I signed a USDA contract on about 750 cords of wood like many contracts there are not stated or stipulations not originally agreed upon, but proceeded ahead anyway. The first year of the program went so so then the following year the lows were in the 40's and my biggest customer was in San Diego which was experiencing a consistent 70's. So I had wood that was cut ready to go, but no market. Then we had a couple of great years and prices were high, but was uncomfortable in investing $50,000 for extra inventory. Then I met another supplier who processed more wood than I could imagine. Up to 9,000 cords per year. So I worked for him a few years to actually pay my debts off. He had 50 people working full time at his project producing 50 cords a day. He told me over and over again how he had companies bring their processors to his site for demonstrations. Where as they all failed miserably. Especially live Oak is great wood, but very inconsistent. I attended a few processor demonstrations, but none that I have seen can go from a 60'' Pine with 16'' limbs to a 18'' Pine with out skipping a beat. So you need the right weather the right supply the right customers at the right time to justify spending from 30,000 to $100,000 in processing equipment. Thanks
Dang, what market could handle 9000 cords a year?! We do around 700, could maybe do 1000 if were bigger.
I have seen videos of processors that use electric sensors to judge the size of the wood and adjust the splitting wedge for best size splits. So it can be done. I still think it would be hard to make every split the same size with any consistency.
9000 cords a year is a lot of wood. The labor cost of 50+ employees would have to be in the $hundreds of thousands a year.. Cutting just that cost in half by using automation could prove very profitable and would justify a very high production processor. I could probably get a contract with my county to provide firewood for their heating programs. Probably be around a 100 cords a year. Certainly not enough wood to justify a large splitting operation, yet to much for a one man production company. This old man isnt interested in trying to do it.
1000$@cord?Why would anyone buy firewood for that price?
Wouldn't it be cheaper to heat with only electricity at that point,old fashioned heat strips?Or am I missing something?