Davej_07
ArboristSite Operative
Heres some pics after I split a piece off my chopping block. Maybe this can confirm the species.
Dave
Dave
With those deep furrows in the bark I would guess cottonwood.
Heres some pics after I split a piece off my chopping block. Maybe this can confirm the species.
Dave
Has to be smooth bark elm. Look at the split marks left behind by some poor devil who tried to split it with an axe. :censored:looks like American elm
yepWell, it confirms it's pretty wood!
That it does look nice. Red elm has really thick, coarse bark, however, so it can't be that. Takes about 7 months for the bark to fall off elm around here. Then, if you can split it, another month or so and it's ready.I would agree now that it is not Ash, at least not the ash we have in Missouri, plus Ash splits so easy. Could it be Red Elm? I am used to that, but usually when I get to elm they have no bark, and already seasoned, so I'm not for sure....
It sure looks nice...
Has to be smooth bark elm. Look at the split marks left behind by some poor devil who tried to split it with an axe. :censored:
Note to KSWoodsman. I ran into some "smooth bark" elm this year in Boys Town. I called it that because the bark was thin, and the wood was imposiible to split with an axe. Believe me, it was not ash, and no one knows what it is. The inside was reddish in color, but the grain does not look like what OP showed here after he finally split it.
The texture of the wood, however, was just like American elm.
That makes the most sense to me. The color is definitely not white ash that is prolific around here. However, the grain of the wood looks like either ash or oak, which are quite similar.Fraxinus Nigra Black Ash.
We have. So far he has turned four mulberry bowls. Unless dry, they move a little after turning them. Nobody seems to mind though. I guess warped bowls are hard to find at the store.Save some of that Mulberry for bowls.
That makes the most sense to me. The color is definitely not white ash that is prolific around here. However, the grain of the wood looks like either ash or oak, which are quite similar.
Note to KsWoodsman: My best friend is going to turn a couple of bowls out of that "smooth bark elm". The heartwood was actually red and the sapwood was almost white. We were calling it mystery wood, so I coined "smooth bark elm" for lack of anything better. The leaf and wood texture were similar to American elm, but that's as far as the similarity went. Red elm has thick, coarse bark, and these logs were anything but that.
Meanwhile, dry mulberry is keeping the house warm these days. That stuff is rather incredible. A log that weighs two-thirds as much as oak kicks out the same heat, if not more. It's literally a freak of nature.
I'll chime in because it's an interesting thought. Mulberry's heat content rating is not as high as oak or hickory, and it takes just as long to dry. Its density when dry is a bit less than oak or hickory. Burning green mulberry, just like oak, will make you think the stuff is worthless. But, when dry, mulberry burns very hot and suddenly you strike gold!
I doubt that it burns hotter than oak, but it certainly leaves the impression that it does because it can throw a shower of sparks (snap, crackle, and pop!). So, you have to be careful with it. Mulberry also seems to like a mix with elm and maple.
Also, when it gets down to business, as they say, mulberry can produce that blue flame that everybody knows is hot. Other berrywoods do the same, especially hackberry, an excellent and underrated firewood in my book. The secret is to get the berrywoods dry, and that takes time and patience.
In my collection, I have two cords of split mulberry that's dry as a bone, and I look forward to burning all of it this winter. opcorn:
Believe me, I don't try to bother you. I seek your advice and opinion and I respect what you have to offer to this forum along with many others who contribute to it. If I annoy you, please forgive me. That is not my intention and never will be. I was not trying to dispute anything.Are you for real ? 1.5 times the amount of heat as Oak ! ? That's quite a claim.
Are there 2 of you ? What you say one week doesn't seem to be the same the next week.
Note to Wood Doctor: If I'm wrong about it being Ash, I don't care. If you havent noticed I don't care to follow you around disputing your words. And until you mention me in a post I don't mix words with you. I also don't know why you seek either an arguement or approval by including me in your posts. I don't give much regard to the self imposed title of Dr. since real doctors still are just a Mr. Ed is it possible that the smooth barked Elm was a Beech ?
In retrospect, I don't know why you bother me , you can call it whatever you care to call your wood. Just leave me out of it. Actually as long as you are being an annoyance to me someone else is being spared from you. Carry on.