Sorry bud but I am not 18......lol!! Somebody is bad at math! And you're already on my ignore list...
Too bad im not 18...LOL! Never said i knew it all.....would you like to show me the post when i said that? I can fend for myself buddy.....these guys are no match. I actually get enjoyment out of it!
Get enjoyment out of whatever you want. Your post reading skills aren't very good either. We never said you were 18. We were talkin' about your chearleader. He's 18. You weren't on my ignore list (he was).............but you are now...
Dis-regard my comments then...sorry buddy its been a really long hard bad day for me....11hrs with constant rain...im sorry...will go remove them now...im an ass in this post...sorry!
Yeah, it's been going around. I had a crappy day at work...
Well your stock went up a little in my book for stepping up to the plate and admitting it was you that went overboard!
Now all you need to do is mount a D176 on a Roper saw and look through the top adjuster hole. Then tell Mark you were mistaken.
I hope it stops raining for ya bud!
Mike
Thing of it is....the roper saw DOES OIL THROUGH THE REGULAR OIL HOLE!!!!!!!......"if" what hes talking about is the early mac 10-10's had the oil output hole in the case in a different area....but the later 10-10 saws it is in a different location and does oil through the regular drilled oil hole....
Uh OK, prove it.
Mark,
Looks like you and I got another pair to laugh about next time I drop you a line.
Chris
Uh OK, prove it.
U prove it...:msp_rolleyes:
Yeah I know, I have been laughing for days already. Now the "spin" comes out. :hmm3grin2orange: Yeah, Ok. :msp_smile:
Mark,
You are wasting your time, people who are never wrong always have a response to make you continually do all the work when they do not have any facts to substantiate their position.
I go through it all the time with my Studebakers with people telling me that Ford made the Studebaker 289, etc. You can show them all the proof in the world but they will never admit they are wrong.
Since I have a couple of Craftsman/Roper 3.7's and Mac 10-10's so I will be happy to accept any extra bars you have in order to do a test fit for the group.
Mark,
You are wasting your time, people who are never wrong always have a response to make you continually do all the work when they do not have any facts to substantiate their position.
I go through it all the time with my Studebakers with people telling me that Ford made the Studebaker 289, etc. You can show them all the proof in the world but they will never admit they are wrong.
Since I have a couple of Craftsman/Roper 3.7's and Mac 10-10's so I will be happy to accept any extra bars you have in order to do a test fit for the group.
Gary, your right of course but I was having some fun watching the show. I never get over watching someone show there ignorance.
No need to bother with your test fit, you already know what will happen.
Thats about what I thought and expected.
For what its worth I have a 10-10A. The only one left but I have owned a couple more 10-10's a Pro 10-10, Pro Mac 10-10 and a Pro Mac 10-10S.
Now I must not know anything about them but I think the ProMac 10-10 would be a late one as is the Pro Mac 10-10S and they all had the same bar pad on the case.
The 4 or so PM605-610's etc are all considered late models and also use the same bar mount.
I have also had a couple of Roper/Craftsman 3.7's and they all had the same bar mount.
Now if you have proof of them having differnet versions and bar mounts please make your point and prove it.
Read what is posted above, swallow that pride and fess up.
Exactly what i expected....:msp_rolleyes:
Enter your email address to join: