Analyst Man
ArboristSite Guru
Yes.I'm confused as well. A 50:1 fuel/oil mix is made up of about 98.04% fuel. But a 32:1 fuel/oil mix is only made up of about 96.97% fuel. Doesn't this mean the 50:1 mix is richer than the 32:1 mix?
Yes.I'm confused as well. A 50:1 fuel/oil mix is made up of about 98.04% fuel. But a 32:1 fuel/oil mix is only made up of about 96.97% fuel. Doesn't this mean the 50:1 mix is richer than the 32:1 mix?
It won't necessarily run hotter, but the combustion will be hotter because of the higher air/fuel ratio. There are other things that can alter the A/F but with all other variables(high speed screw) unchanged, just changing your mix ratio will lead to slightly hotter combustion. Is it enough to start melting a piston? Good question, but if the high speed screw is already set to the ragged edge of a lean A/F mix one could question the possibility.A saw that requires 50/1 fuel mix will run hotter and leaner if you use 32/1 mix??? I've never heard that, isn't it the other way around?
You seem like you have a pretty good handle on it. I'd be willing to bet there are some good dealers out there that would go to bat for the customer. I have read stories about every major manufacturer snubbing their customers in a similar situation though. It's an across the board EPA issue.So let me get this straight in my mind:
Echo corporate complies with Epa regulations by shipping saws tuned lean.
These saws generally have restrictive mufflers which we know further compounds any heat issues that would occur in a lean condition.
Many, many of these saws go right out the door in a box in the new owner’s hands. (A large part of Echo’s sales model.)
Some go out of small engine shops “tuned” by mechanics there. If the caps are even popped at that point, they go back in leaving little to no room on the hi screw to tune richer as the saw loosens up.
The unknowing owners run their saw hot as it slowly but surely burns up. Or, since it on the edge of burning up, any miniscule fuel delivery issue kills their machine.
Echo provides a 5 year warranty on their equipment but they take no responsibility for burned up engines due to lean condition. (Remember the box-store saws...they don’t get any “dealer support”).
Dealers (or people who work for dealers or are in some way associated or somehow have a horse in the race) and enthusiasts come on here and places like here to recommend immediate fuel adjustments and muffler mods to make these Echos run right out of the box, as they are known to be lean (and low powered) due to Echo’s current environmental compliance strategy. I hope Echo thanks you for that!
Now then; if a consumer has what they believe is a legitimate warranty claim said consumer replaces the caps on the carb AND buys a new muffler to make sure the service centre knows that the saw hasn’t been tampered with (cause you wouldn’t want any questions raised about that). Surely sending the saw to Echo corporate in modified condition would be folly. Then you may have to wait 3 months to even know if your claim is legit. And this claim you start is probably going to cost you at-the-least a not-really nominal inspection fee, considering it is probably at least 10% of the cost of the saw.
Echo is not the only company that has done this but they are way late to the party on developing the technology to correctly comply with regulations and make their saws run properly “out of the box”.
Echo’s evasive environmental regulation compliance strategy leaves some customers out in the cold.
Does this sound like a company that competes head-to-head with Husqvarna and Stihl (or even Makita/Dolmar) in the pro user market?
Echo corporate hasn’t the right attitude nor the product line nor the product support to play in the big woods.
You seem like you have a pretty good handle on it. I'd be willing to bet there are some good dealers out there that would go to bat for the customer. I have read stories about every major manufacturer snubbing their customers in a similar situation though. It's an across the board EPA issue.
I wonder what happens if we use the search function here for "trim the limiters"?
So let me get this straight in my mind:
Echo corporate complies with Epa regulations by shipping saws tuned lean.
These saws generally have restrictive mufflers which we know further compounds any heat issues that would occur in a lean condition.
Many, many of these saws go right out the door in a box in the new owner’s hands. (A large part of Echo’s sales model.)
Some go out of small engine shops “tuned” by mechanics there. If the caps are even popped at that point, they go back in leaving little to no room on the hi screw to tune richer as the saw loosens up.
The unknowing owners run their saw hot as it slowly but surely burns up. Or, since it on the edge of burning up, any miniscule fuel delivery issue kills their machine.
Echo provides a 5 year warranty on their equipment but they take no responsibility for burned up engines due to lean condition. (Remember the box-store saws...they don’t get any “dealer support”).
Dealers (or people who work for dealers or are in some way associated or somehow have a horse in the race) and enthusiasts come on here and places like here to recommend immediate fuel adjustments and muffler mods to make these Echos run right out of the box, as they are known to be lean (and low powered) due to Echo’s current environmental compliance strategy. I hope Echo thanks you for that!
Now then; if a consumer has what they believe is a legitimate warranty claim said consumer replaces the caps on the carb AND buys a new muffler to make sure the service centre knows that the saw hasn’t been tampered with (cause you wouldn’t want any questions raised about that). Surely sending the saw to Echo corporate in modified condition would be folly. Then you may have to wait 3 months to even know if your claim is legit. And this claim you start is probably going to cost you at-the-least a not-really nominal inspection fee, considering it is probably at least 10% of the cost of the saw.
Echo is not the only company that has done this but they are way late to the party on developing the technology to correctly comply with regulations and make their saws run properly “out of the box”.
Echo’s evasive environmental regulation compliance strategy leaves some customers out in the cold.
Does this sound like a company that competes head-to-head with Husqvarna and Stihl (or even Makita/Dolmar) in the pro user market?
Echo corporate hasn’t the right attitude nor the product line nor the product support to play in the big woods.
Depends on how you look at it. Many like me don't want auto tune, I have a husky with it and I'll pass. So as long as echo continues to dodge the autotune it will be one of the many reasons I will look to them.So let me get this straight in my mind:
Echo corporate complies with Epa regulations by shipping saws tuned lean.
These saws generally have restrictive mufflers which we know further compounds any heat issues that would occur in a lean condition.
Many, many of these saws go right out the door in a box in the new owner’s hands. (A large part of Echo’s sales model.)
Some go out of small engine shops “tuned” by mechanics there. If the caps are even popped at that point, they go back in leaving little to no room on the hi screw to tune richer as the saw loosens up.
The unknowing owners run their saw hot as it slowly but surely burns up. Or, since it on the edge of burning up, any miniscule fuel delivery issue kills their machine.
Echo provides a 5 year warranty on their equipment but they take no responsibility for burned up engines due to lean condition. (Remember the box-store saws...they don’t get any “dealer support”).
Dealers (or people who work for dealers or are in some way associated or somehow have a horse in the race) and enthusiasts come on here and places like here to recommend immediate fuel adjustments and muffler mods to make these Echos run right out of the box, as they are known to be lean (and low powered) due to Echo’s current environmental compliance strategy. I hope Echo thanks you for that!
Now then; if a consumer has what they believe is a legitimate warranty claim said consumer replaces the caps on the carb AND buys a new muffler to make sure the service centre knows that the saw hasn’t been tampered with (cause you wouldn’t want any questions raised about that). Surely sending the saw to Echo corporate in modified condition would be folly. Then you may have to wait 3 months to even know if your claim is legit. And this claim you start is probably going to cost you at-the-least a not-really nominal inspection fee, considering it is probably at least 10% of the cost of the saw.
Echo is not the only company that has done this but they are way late to the party on developing the technology to correctly comply with regulations and make their saws run properly “out of the box”.
Echo’s evasive environmental regulation compliance strategy leaves some customers out in the cold.
Does this sound like a company that competes head-to-head with Husqvarna and Stihl (or even Makita/Dolmar) in the pro user market?
Echo corporate hasn’t the right attitude nor the product line nor the product support to play in the big woods.
Depends on how you look at it. Many like me don't want auto tune, I have a husky with it and I'll pass. So as long as echo continues to dodge the autotune it will be one of the many reasons I will look to them.
That sounds like the the gist of what's being discussed here. These facts, if true, would be an extraordinary allegation, maybe even along the lines of what VW did with their diesel engines. I wonder if there's any way to reasonably (from a cost perspective), prove it? Probably not, unfortunately.
That's the word. I'm thinking it might show up on the 680 replacement, but who knows.That’s one of the biggest reasons I bought my cs590.
I think I read somewhere that Echo is developing auto tune too..?
Get them while they’re hot. And then pull the caps to cool them down.
It very well could run hotter and should. While the oil in the fuel is needed, it is also an impurity as to how fuel burns and octane rating is concerned . The more oil, the more you lower your octane. Lower the octane the hotter the burn. That's why on most cans of ready use it says they "use" 92 or 93 octane fuel, not "it is" that.It won't necessarily run hotter, but the combustion will be hotter because of the higher air/fuel ratio. There are other things that can alter the A/F but with all other variables(high speed screw) unchanged, just changing your mix ratio will lead to slightly hotter combustion. Is it enough to start melting a piston? Good question, but if the high speed screw is already set to the ragged edge of a lean A/F mix one could question the possibility.
You can run any ratio you want as long as the saw is tuned for it.
25:1 with a 50:1 tune is gonna cause a problem
There are many here who use fuel fresh enough that the corn gas isn't an issue. Many claim that their equipment sits for months with it in it without issue. Different strokes...Probably. I wouldn't do it, but I'm not concerned that running 40/1 in any of my 50/1 saws is going to cause a problem. I'll probably be chastised for admitting it but I also mix with 91 octane that has 10% ethanol. My first 2 saws only lasted 34 years on that mix during which I knew nothing about tuning. Just lucky I guess.
Enter your email address to join: