MasterBlaster
TreeHouse Elder
Cool! I stand corrected...
Can-Do-It said:To me the flipline and lanyard are two different items. The lanyard being somewhat more flexible when the rope coating wears off. I've been using the 10' 2 in 1 lanyard with aluminum safety snaps for about a 1 1/2 years. I personally think it's a great tool to have on your belt. I've used it to snag rope, limbs and redirects while still being tied in with other end.
The flipline on the other hand that I'm wanting will be very stiff with a micro accender. As I'm learning from this forum, it does not have to be cable coated to be flipable all the time. And when I say all the time I mean that it's made to be stiff and flipable after 6 months of heavy uses.
It's such a pain, at least for me, while accending a 30" diameter pine or larger and having to fight to get the flipline I'm using over items on the backside of the trees. Most of these trees have no limbs for till about 40'.
You'al have a Blessed Evening,
hobby climber said:Tinman44, I use the 2 in 1 wire core rope (10'), hip prusik with locking snap. For me its fine but wished it had swivel snaps at the ends instead. Rope is easier to daisy chain & cheaper to replace.
tshanefreeman said:...but I really like the piece of mind that the metal core won't be cut in the event of an accident. I personally always try to double connect before firing up my saw, but I still like the idea that one of my connection points is not able to be cut as easy as that of a traditional braided rope!
Tom Dunlap said:I've talked with several people who have done "cut tests" on cable-core fliplines compared to rope. The cable cuts easily. Don't even think that you have an extra margin of safety. That's an illusion.
You'd be better served always double tieing instead of just "trying". No need to even go to the regs in Z133. It just plain makes sense.