It's a 2 stage pump, around 700 psi it kicks down to like 1gpm.
Home made log spliter
- Thread starter cledoux
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
YES, the engine is too small for the pump. 22 gpm is way too much for an 13 hp motor. As a rule of thumb, it takes about 1 & 1/4 hp to make 1 gpm of flow at 2000 psi. Mathematically you need 26 hp to flow 22 gpm at 2000 psi. Right now you have LOTS of flow, but not enough horse power to make 2000 psi. The pump must be sized in relation to the motor. Too big a pump = lots of flow, but not enough pressure. Too small a pump = lots of pressure capability, but not enough flow. Decide what psi you want for your system, then plug in the numbers and do the math.
For a wood splitter, the best of both worlds is a two-stage pump. A large gpm pump for fast travel speed under light load, with a smaller pump stacked onto it to generate the high pressure needed for that last stage hard push.
https://www.calcunation.com/calculator/hydraulic-pump-horsepower.php
That's exactly what I ran into on my first splitter attempt. Motor was about 8hp and the pump was off a backhoe - spare parts someone gave me. I'm running two stacked 2.5" cylinders, but the motor wouldn't even run with the pump attached. I'm now running a 7hp motor with a smaller single stage pump. Had a gauge on it at one point and I think it showed about 2000 - 2500 psi. Not the fastest but I haven't found anything it won't split yet. btw, I built it about 40 years ago and it still runs fine. Motor was replaced about ten years ago.
with a little assumption, here. I forget that the real world has single stage pumps, and engines sized for them.
With a log splitter (and other industrial applications) a 2 stage pump is assumed to be...
One of the best features is less violence when a troublesome knot separates.
Change that to a single stage pump, there would be flying firewood, and damaged operators!
With a log splitter (and other industrial applications) a 2 stage pump is assumed to be...
One of the best features is less violence when a troublesome knot separates.
Change that to a single stage pump, there would be flying firewood, and damaged operators!
That does solve a lot of problems
The low volume/high pressure side is exactly 1/5th the high volume displacement, so when the 2nd stage kicks in, he's pumping only 4.4 GPM at up to 3000 psi.
He's got lots of leftover power to run that pump.
Has anyone ever tried running a two-stage pump backwards? I imagine it would pump, but perhaps not kick-down as needed.
If it isn't dropping the volume and kicking up the pressure correctly, you should make sure the inflow & outflow on the pump are done correctly!
He's got lots of leftover power to run that pump.
Has anyone ever tried running a two-stage pump backwards? I imagine it would pump, but perhaps not kick-down as needed.
If it isn't dropping the volume and kicking up the pressure correctly, you should make sure the inflow & outflow on the pump are done correctly!
long journey of try this, try that. fix this, fix that.
I know what the attraction of free or cheap stuff is. Been there, done that. I ran a vertical 8 hp for awhile on this. smaller pump, it worked, but was problematical with the start on the motor being a pos. Then ran a china diesel for awhile with a larger pump. Ran cheap, but kept being under powered, and noisy. Eventually got to where it would not start. That generated the thought of I am NOT going to be under powered again on this. A 15 would do it, but why not a 18 ? Sure it uses a little more fuel, but the darn thing runs so smooth now! and that 22 pump isn't a problem for it. I can stall it out on some pieces. At that point the beam flexes about 1/4 inch. 22 tons.
The self propelled feature of this machine is a lot of fun once a year I drive it in the local 4th parade...
I know what the attraction of free or cheap stuff is. Been there, done that. I ran a vertical 8 hp for awhile on this. smaller pump, it worked, but was problematical with the start on the motor being a pos. Then ran a china diesel for awhile with a larger pump. Ran cheap, but kept being under powered, and noisy. Eventually got to where it would not start. That generated the thought of I am NOT going to be under powered again on this. A 15 would do it, but why not a 18 ? Sure it uses a little more fuel, but the darn thing runs so smooth now! and that 22 pump isn't a problem for it. I can stall it out on some pieces. At that point the beam flexes about 1/4 inch. 22 tons.
The self propelled feature of this machine is a lot of fun once a year I drive it in the local 4th parade...
cledoux
ArboristSite Lurker
ok thanks, yes steel these days is way to expensive. Hopefully it comes down in our next election.
1/5 ratio isn't a hard or fast rule for log splitter pumps. Not certain where you came up with that. I checked specs on several pumps and came out all over the place. No clear ratio. Rugged made shows the same 6.7gpm high pressure side on both the 22 and 28 gpm pump.
can't comment on the running one backwards. Never tried it.
The OP told us what pump he had. I looked up the high-flow and the low-flow displacement, then did the math.
It is assuredly 5:1 volume reduction, presuming equal internal leakage & bypass.
I don't think I've ever disassembled a two-stage pump. Many gear and piston pumps can run backward and they just reverse the flow, although the inlet and outflow lines are usually not built for that. It occurred to me that if a two-stage pump was running backward, it might pump fine, and generate flow and pressure, but never step down to low pressure.
It's just a thought... I've never been there, nor seen that.
1. I don't see a relief valve adjustment on the directional control valve. If it dose not have one, that could be a problem. 
2. You said you adjusted the pressure on the pump. There is no pressure adjustment on the pump. The only adjustment on the pump, would be the adjustment for the unloading valve. The unloading valve just controls the output of the high volume side of the pump. If you adjusted the unloading valve to high, it will stall the engine. There is no adjustment for the high pressure side of the pump on the pump. The high pressure should be adjusted on the directional control valve.
2. You said you adjusted the pressure on the pump. There is no pressure adjustment on the pump. The only adjustment on the pump, would be the adjustment for the unloading valve. The unloading valve just controls the output of the high volume side of the pump. If you adjusted the unloading valve to high, it will stall the engine. There is no adjustment for the high pressure side of the pump on the pump. The high pressure should be adjusted on the directional control valve.
90% of log splitter valves have an integral non adjustable relief valve. Usually built in right above the return port. With the pictures provided, it's hard to tell what style of valve it is for sure. the 2 faces of the valve we can see show a pretty generic splitter valve that would have this style of relief.
Similar threads
