brenndatomu
Hey you woodchucks, quit chucking my wood!
Care to elaborate?They've done the same "refinements" I did to mine
Care to elaborate?They've done the same "refinements" I did to mine
very true! some people just expect too much for nothing!I have an owb now but I had a Hotblast for years. Loved it and was very very happy with it, even wished I had it long before I did. I've talked to 4 people who have bought one after seeing mine. They've done the same "refinements" I did to mine and are happy with theirs. Sure they might use more wood but still much cheaper than oil or propane for them. All houses are large and used lots of either oil, electricity or propane to heat to what the owners wanted. And they are far cheaper than a new furnace install especially if you already have duct heating. My wife could cook us out of the house if she wanted to and we easily had 12 hour "productive" burns. We seldom had to restart a fire from scratch.
Lovin' it‼Load wood into the Hotblast for the heat demand you are putting on it.
the manual actually says to install both in the chimney. the baro is supposed to go above the key in the pipe. the idea is that if you have a chimney fire you can still kill the heat goin into the pipe and just let the cold air in minimizing damage i believe. at any rate, you could have bothI have been kicking around putting a key damper on my sisters flue for their Yukon Big Jack. It has a baro on it now, but I think capping the baro off and using a manual damper may still maintain a nice long burn, (it does that OK now) but help clean up the chimney since the cool air from the baro will be eliminated. That, and convincing them to get further ahead on their wood supply so they have dryer wood...I somehow have become the family chimney sweep...grumblegrumblegrumble
Take note of this y'all...
Obviously, the art of using a flue damper to keep all the heat from running out the flue... has been forgotten by many.
Five hours on 7³/ft?? Seriously?? He fills it with full length firewood... that's 27 inches long, correct?? He cuts his firewood to 27 inches??
Well, my DAKA with its 5.3³/ft firebox gets loaded with 16 inch firewood... even if I did load it to the top (I don't... well, rarely) that's only 3.4³/ft utilized, and it runs way, way, longer than 5 hours on something way less than loaded to the top. But I do have a flue damper installed... and I know how to set it. Sounds like the problem... 5 hours on 7³/ft(?)... is operator error (where have I heard that before?), not the box itself.
Too damn funny
*
The point is that the volume of wood doesn't have the burn time the newer * smaller* units do
Nice! Dang dude, that was FAST!Every house house has a wood stove that was ment to be. I say this because there are so many variables influencing a wood burning unit (geography, house,chimney type, chimney height ect) And the hot blast was just not working out for me.. Call it operator error or stupidity but I'm way more satisfied with the ease of use and efficiency of the tundra. And I like to see a secondary burn like this with a non modified hotblast...View attachment 388016View attachment 388017
Enter your email address to join: