I never said the woodland can do huge slabs. And I did say that one advantage to chainsaw mills is the portability and the nearly unlimited bar lengths. However, if you are expecting to be doing dimensional lumber with chainsaws its just the wrong piece of equipment. I haven't seen all his vids, but its my impression that Matt C could have continued using a chainsaw for slabbing. He didn't... he went to great lengths and expense to have one of the baddest mills out there. A 660 is certainly fine for a few slabs. After a while, its just gonna get frustrating. If you haven't run a bandsaw mill, even a small one, I suggest you try it. I love my chainsaws, but my mill is definitely the biggest kick to run. Its super safe, and efficient. No, it won't slab off 50" oak, but then again, a few slabs on 50" oak is gonna be an all day project for a 660. I just don't want to see a whole pile of guys buy 660's for milling and then find out they are inadequate for the job they want to do. For the price its definitely enticing to just get in and go for it. But I don't think that ultimately it'll be as light on the pocket book as you think. imho.
And you are exactly right about the woodland. an ideal log is 22-24" diameter on my mill. any bigger and I'm carving pieces off with the chainsaw. ...that and bigger than that is difficult to move for one guy without hydraulics or a loader
And also, with Wranglerstars Lucas mill, yes I know thats hugely product placement. I'd have to try one to be convinced it'd be the way to go. I like the fact that you can sharpen it very quickly. But it just looks clunky and awkward to use. I dunno. lotta $$ too.