I assume the basic spec really was 3.2 kw, and if that translates into 4.3 or 4.4 depends on if the hp is hp(i) or hp(m). Hp(m) is what commonly is used on chainsaws though, except on some recent Husky and Stihl models, that oddly is rated in hp(i) on the US market. Theyn are rated in hp(m) in Europe.
Both are bhp, so that designation doesn't mean anything, regarding the difference between hp(m) and hp(i).
Exact calculations on one decimal kW numbers are "risky" anyway, but 1,00 kW basically is 1.34 hp(i), and 1.36 hp(m).
Equipment companies around the world are almost always overly optimistic about their power/hp rating. The Japanese are notorious liars about this sorta thing.
Kevin