With a brake!
thats broken unfortunately. Is there any significance to it? I know lots of these older saws had them in Canada at least.With a brake!
I pulled off the clutch cover last night and realized that I just misunderstood the inner workings. It turns out that the chain brake works just fine!I've never seen a functioning brake on those models, but as I understand it the brake consisted of a mechanical "plunger" that pressed against the clutch drum, as well as a switch that killed the ignition.
I don't have any good photos but if you look at the saw with the covers off you can see how the mechanical brake was intended to work.
Mark
Old got to play alongside newer yesterday evening.
930 Super obtained recently went real well- till I clipped a few pebbles in the bark (trees were dragged and placed by an excavator after they were dropped), so instead of field sharpening or pushing a dull chain- got the 2186 out the back of the truck.
In all fairness- from an unbiased user perspective- the 2186 is nicer and more comfortable- but the 930 sounds cooler!
View attachment 1215492
I'm certainly not one to comment on the newer saws, but if the 2094 is any indication of refinery and/or improvements, I'd have to believe big cc saws have gotten more comfortable to run and smoother overall. I hear that a lot, but I also wonder how many guys making a living with the present big cc saws have run the older ones as well day in and day out. I believe that a real comparison would be a week with one and then the other.
Running these vintage saws professionally, I HAD to have at least four saws on hand. I couldn't take the chance of failure from older saws. As I mentioned once, I got down to one saw due to a perfect storm of unusual circumstances on one job. 95% of the time, however, I never touched the other two.
Kevin
Picked up my first Jonsered over the weekend,...a cs2171.
Need to know if a front handle from a 372xp fits the 2171.
What other saws might share the same front handle?
Thanks!
Thanks for that info.365/372 can be made to fit- but not really, rear mount holes in the tank do not line up the same.
2065 through to 2172 will fit perfectly.
Thanks for that info.
Bought this saw and noticed the handle was bent,......snapped it while straightening.
less than 150 psi with no scoring but well worn. Missing various screws ( is locktite a rare commodity these days?)
Started and ran though.
365/372 can be made to fit- but not really, rear mount holes in the tank do not line up the same.
2065 through to 2172 will fit perfectly.
Yeah,.....it's cracked above the upper spring mount. It will take more bending to get it straight though. Couldn't remember which had the angled handle, Husq or Jons.A good welder with a TIG can repair your original handle- sounds like a repaired handle might not look out of place with what you have,
Buff up the cylinder(Wigglesworth method), throw in Cabers and you're off to the races with probably 150+psi and little work.Thanks for that info.
Bought this saw and noticed the handle was bent,......snapped it while straightening.
less than 150 psi with no scoring but well worn. Missing various screws ( is locktite a rare commodity these days?)
Started and ran though.
Enter your email address to join: