View attachment 85230
Here's a shot of the crew sorting out a mile of soggy, frozen rope. That camera with the big ol honkin lens hangin off the front was sure put to good use. Thanks for the pics.
I like that shot from the holdback side of the house. The use of two hoisting devices simultaneously was key to saving the skylights and vent stacks sticking up out of the roof. By keeping lots of drag on the two holdback lines, the slope of the roof allowed the log to hover over the obstacles as it moved sideways towards the eaves.
Ever wonder how those shots of the log moving were taken? Our intrepid orchestrateur made a climb to a vantage point on the broken 40' stump, Jimmy Swaggert style, just to watch. Once on the ground, I couldn't really see beans.
The lift/lower involved a communication challenge between 4 people. While two of us winched (one on the GRCS, and one on the Hobbs), we couldn't see each other, because the house was between us. Two of us held holdback tag lines (Lakeside on the tip, & Mr. Woodland on the butt), and the winchers couldn't see either of them, neither.
Somebody else had to call the time for this square dance. Of course, who else is allowed to do absolutely nothing (physically), except for taking video & pictures, and saying something once in a while, but the boss?
Looking back at other emergency storm jobs over the past 35 years, there was one thing different about this one. That is the fact that there was no damage to the roof. They skated away clean on this one.
Lots of times we encounter clients with water damage inside the house. Or, even worse, the arborists sometimes cause even more damage that is incidental to getting the log off the house. I would love to hear how others have handled the aftermath of a removal operation that involves more distruction than that caused by the storm failure alone.
Arboreally yours,
Ox
www.treedr.com