Yup, no argument there but many similarities. Don't you think that the engineers had their pencils reasonably sharp and although they were not designing a race saw got flow and back pressure designed for a balance of power and economy.
The top main design criteria are emissions, noise, and size(will it fit). If efficiency were higher up, chainsaws would have huge louvres or ports as they did before 1996 when the first serious rounds of emissions laws attacked two stroke engines(a la the dual port mufflers on Stihls). Everything about chainsaw mufflers is foremost a compromise of these aforementioned factors. Tuning a tiny box to 'resonate' properly or add tuned back pressure is like teaching a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig. If you want plenty of back pressure, you couldn't do any better than to use a tiny box with a tiny hole for a muffler unless you simply plugged the exhaust.
Many people cite lower cylinder temps after muffler mod's and porting. If you flow enough raw unburned fuel straight through and out the exhaust things are bound to run cooler but you'll be filling up all the more. If anyone can prove otherwise I'm all ears.
Most of the 'excess' heat is the factory saw running lean into an exhaust that is not designed to flow well. A good mixture out of a free-flowing exhaust will almost always be cooler than a relatively new stock saw set to factory specs to pass emissions.