Streblerm
Addicted to ArboristSite
This is why I love the Internet. A bunch of enablers confirming your ideas. Seriously though,
This is right along the lines of what I am thinking.
The Rudd setup I linked to the spec sheet uses one of their tankless water heaters along with an air handler with an A-coil and a water to air heat exchanger. It pretty much lists all their tankless heaters as possible heat sources. Before I buy one I will definitely check to see if they are rated for use with hydronic heating and if they can sustain the necessary output. There is quite a price range available, like 500-3000 dollars for tankless heaters. I'm sure plenty of them would not be suitable for heating.
As far as terminology goes it is my understanding that technically water heater vs boiler is the ability to heat water vs the ability To generate steam and condensing vs non condensing refers to effeciency. There are non condensing tankless water heaters that around 80% efficient and condensing tankless units that are around 95%. Condensing boiler is often used to refer to a any condensing unit but technically a boiler will make steam while a water heater won't. Most of the tankless units are capable of operating at a maximum of 150-199k btus and a minimum of 15-20k. My heating needs wouldn't necessarily max it out. I think they run a variable flame in order to do this. Some or all of this may be right, I'm still learning.
As far as the desuperheater goes you ar right there. It steals heat from the heat pump so in the winter time there would be no gain.
With a heat load that high, I don't think there will be many times that you won't need that 50 gallons of water you have already heated. Also not sure an on-demand heater would be designed to stand a continuous output that high - the load to heat a house is a LOT more than the load to heat DHW. Something to check out. It would either lead to the tankless heater running most all the time, or a lot of short cycling. I also don't think you will get much out of tying the heat pump water heater (desuperheater?) to this setup - coils need much hotter water than a desuperheater can produce, and you would lose some of the heat pump liquid heat to efficiency losses during the heat exchanger part of that. I think most people I know that heat their DHW with their geo system can heat their DHW with it, but only adequately.
I would likely do a condensing boiler with the biggest coil you can easily fit.
And replace the heat pump.
This is right along the lines of what I am thinking.
The Rudd setup I linked to the spec sheet uses one of their tankless water heaters along with an air handler with an A-coil and a water to air heat exchanger. It pretty much lists all their tankless heaters as possible heat sources. Before I buy one I will definitely check to see if they are rated for use with hydronic heating and if they can sustain the necessary output. There is quite a price range available, like 500-3000 dollars for tankless heaters. I'm sure plenty of them would not be suitable for heating.
As far as terminology goes it is my understanding that technically water heater vs boiler is the ability to heat water vs the ability To generate steam and condensing vs non condensing refers to effeciency. There are non condensing tankless water heaters that around 80% efficient and condensing tankless units that are around 95%. Condensing boiler is often used to refer to a any condensing unit but technically a boiler will make steam while a water heater won't. Most of the tankless units are capable of operating at a maximum of 150-199k btus and a minimum of 15-20k. My heating needs wouldn't necessarily max it out. I think they run a variable flame in order to do this. Some or all of this may be right, I'm still learning.
As far as the desuperheater goes you ar right there. It steals heat from the heat pump so in the winter time there would be no gain.