bitzer
******** Timber Expert
Of course it fell 90 degrees to the hold wood! That's where I aimed it! I feel like we've stepped backwards. Now. If I had faced the tree the opposite direction that I did the tree would have gone that way without a problem. The reasons I did not start on the camera side instead was like I mentioned there was slightly more top weight on the camera side allowing for favorable movement. In physical realtion to the actually typography I'm cutting on the downhill side of the stump. Swinging over the downhill slope would gain too much momentum for the hold wood to hang on all the way through. The wind was another factor in how I cut the tree. It was coming out of the northwest. The tree was faced to the north. The reason I mention to look at it on the ground is you can mentally put the tree back on the stump and see that the stem had a backward lean. You can also see saw marks in the butt similar to when you bore cut. This is where I was "sawing " into the backcut in order to open it up. So you are thinking the center of gravity line is north and south? West (hinge side)being the high side and east (camera side)the low? If that were the case all I would have needed to do was use a single kerf Dutchman and she would have laid right out. Also there is slightly less sapwood on the south side, indicating the wood was under compression there.