Haynes service manual list PM605 data:
3.5ci/58cc(should say 44cc not 58cc to match 3.5ci)
bore/stroke pi (RxR)xstroke=displacement
1.57 x 1.38 =3.4989ci
40 x 35 =43.982cc
I think 1.57/40mm bore is a typo and should be 1.81/46mm
1.81 x 1.38 =3.6ci
46 x 35 =58.16cc
__________________________________________
Haynes service manual list PM610/Super610/PM650/PM655 data:
3.7ci/60cc
bore/stroke pi (RxR)xstroke=displacement
1.85 x 1.38 =3.7ci
4.7 x 35 =60.72cc (bore should be 47)
______________________________________
Haynes service manual list Timber Bear data: assume 600134
3.4ci/55cc (data matches acres site) (should say 3.6ci/58cc)
bore/stroke pi (RxR)xstroke=displacement
1.81 x 1.38 =3.6ci (inch and metric bore/stroke match acres site)
46 x 35 =58.16cc
_____________________________________________________
The McCulloch data in the official 1987 IPL 218689-02 show only 2 piston sizes/pn 1.9"/60cc and 1.8"/58cc yet the tech data shows 3 bores???
3 of these IPL show 4.7mm/1.9"/60cc yes 4 . 7 not 47
For now I'm going with timber bear as 58cc until I can popsicle stick the bore.
Todays popsicle stick test proves to me the bore is 46mm on my timber bear and is therefore 58cc/3.6cid and probably the other PM605/600134 family are the same. 40mm x 35mm=43.982cc seems awful small to be in the same family!!!