madmarksolomon
Timber Junkie
I wouldn't us it is falling a leaner up the hill.
Very good point Cfaller
Very good point Cfaller
Thing is that the cut listed above is considered "acceptable" by the Pro's on here...well I like my way...basically the same deal but yet I can't even discuss the technique I and many others in hardwood country use to handle leaners W/O starting a pissing match. All I want to know is why is the Coos Bay non face cut is acceptable but the "Kiss of Death" bore cut method is considered just one foot closer to the grave.
IMO there is nothing "safer" about cutting the sides out narrowing your tag front then back cutting and leaving a post as it breaks over. My way...and I am saying "My" way due to the fact that the people who actually use the method won't admit it on here due to being slammed for such foolishness...
As I was saying, "my" way completely elliminates the heart leaving a front tag and rear trigger...(1) fricken cut and pop the trigger...that's it. Yet that method is considered dangerous and I will probably get my hand smacked for even discussing it. Oh well.
CFaller...dude in NO way am I dissing you for your work at all period...I would just like a clear reason as to why the Non Faced Coos Bay is acceptable and the "kiss of Death" isn't.
When describing the cut you should have stuck "coos bay" monicker on it! That may have made a world of difference in it being accepted. I caught heck a while back for suggesting a heavy leaner be taken down without a face notch, from the same folks that are praising the coos bay no face! Werid, huh?
Ron, I don't think it you and Jon and guys like you that worry us so bad. I have seen 12 or more guests at one time, they cannot even ask ?????. but we cannot protect everyone and this is the logging n forestry forum so..... now what happened to that white oak guy? that gets me, I guess we'll never know.
if some of you were working for me we might discuss a change in cutting style but only in the interests of safety and production. If you're getting enough wood on the ground, safely and efficiently, to keep the boss happy and the money coming in it doesn't matter if you drop down on all fours and gnaw the log off at the stump with your teeth. Safety counts. Production counts. The rest is just window dressing.
this is so much of the truth it is worth years of value. When these 2 things are not there, neither the production nor the safety, a fellow is on his way to taking a walk.
and for whatever it's worth...there are times when i wish i could cut smaller wood and not have to play mountain goat on cow-face ground. Some of you guys don't know how easy you have it. So there.
yup. Comodity wood on decent ground will pay the bills a whole lot faster than oversize on tough ground. Especially if its tall, for me that means 2 16s and 3 18s, and topwood.
Consistency, reliability, can handle a scrape, and an internal drive to do whats right and work for the intended goal. You have to be able to see how to get your numbers every day. Every day. Thats a good faller.
Bob, that is an undeserved compliment but thanks. I still remember your hesitancy to answer my question long ago about why the feller in a posted video kept revving his saw. I knew you were sizing up my sincerity when you responded. I knew then that you were my kind of guy and I should listen very carefully when you speak. Ron
Enter your email address to join: