BDM53ENT
ArboristSite Operative
New terminology for me, we usually just split em to make it more manageable. If you had asked me before this thread, being from down south, I would have told you it was cat-fishing with your hands :msp_thumbsup:
![]()
The "noodles" are the long chips produced from this type of cut.
I didn't know thats what it was called either till I came here...![]()
I was just doing that today on large stuff too big to split by hand. I was cutting with the wood standing on end, from top to bottom, not from the bark side. It seemed pretty hard on the chain. Is that so? Is it better to cut with the wood laying on the bark, and cut from the bark down?
You were "ripping" the hardest on the saw for sure. QUOTE]
Yes! Ripping is the opposite of noodling, and different than cross cutting. Noodling is done with the grain so as to make long chips. Ripping is across the ends of the grain and makes very small chips. Ripping requires a lot of torque and chain is normally ground with top plate angle at 0-10 degrees vs 25-35 degrees normally used for cross cutting.
Originally Posted by stormpetrel
I was just doing that today on large stuff too big to split by hand. I was cutting with the wood standing on end, from top to bottom, not from the bark side. It seemed pretty hard on the chain. Is that so? Is it better to cut with the wood laying on the bark, and cut from the bark down?
You were "ripping" the hardest on the saw for sure. QUOTE]
Yes! Ripping is the opposite of noodling, and different than cross cutting. Noodling is done with the grain so as to make long chips. Ripping is across the ends of the grain and makes very small chips. Ripping requires a lot of torque and chain is normally ground with top plate angle at 0-10 degrees vs 25-35 degrees normally used for cross cutting.
I could tell the saw was being challenged. I thought the chain was dull, until I cross-cut a log and it cut like it wasn't there. I'm glad I asked my (dumb) question!
And, in the new saw (550XP) department: I have about 6-7 tanks through it, and it continues to improve in throttle response and somewhat slowly in power. I understand it takes about twenty tanks to break her in good?
Originally Posted by stormpetrel
I was just doing that today on large stuff too big to split by hand. I was cutting with the wood standing on end, from top to bottom, not from the bark side. It seemed pretty hard on the chain. Is that so? Is it better to cut with the wood laying on the bark, and cut from the bark down?
I could tell the saw was being challenged. I thought the chain was dull, until I cross-cut a log and it cut like it wasn't there. I'm glad I asked my (dumb) question!
And, in the new saw (550XP) department: I have about 6-7 tanks through it, and it continues to improve in throttle response and somewhat slowly in power. I understand it takes about twenty tanks to break her in good?
There are no dumb questions!
But there are some very stupid answers:hmm3grin2orange:
Happy Holidays!
New terminology for me, we usually just split em to make it more manageable. If you had asked me before this thread, being from down south, I would have told you it was cat-fishing with your hands :msp_thumbsup:
I have a thing for Brunettes!![]()
You can have the one on the right.
I'll take the one on the left.:msp_smile:
Lee
I use a ported 2171 with the western clutch cover to do almost all my wood "splitting". I cut it all into firewood size pieces rather than just quartering since I don't have a hydraulic splitter and it's a fun saw to run. You can pick the ugliest knot filled oak and make nice firewood that stacks decent since you don't have to split it the way the grain runs.