sILlogger
Addicted to ArboristSite
newguy, u brag about things that no one give a sh*t about....
opcorn: opcorn: opcorn: opcorn:
opcorn: opcorn: opcorn: opcorn:
Whered you get that pop corn?
this is getting good :biggrinbounce2:
$20 a bag.....:hmm3grin2orange:
newguy, u brag about things that no one give a sh*t about....
I personally don't think he's braggin.
But, rather,
just keepin some interest in this thread.
Seems kinda ho-hum tonight.
I may be in the wrong area on this forum. If so someone please help me find the appropriate place for this. I just know this area has regular participation.
So my frustration, my neighbor is having the logs taken off of her land. No big deal other than I'm a little worried about her plan for cleaning the branches up.
ANYWAY, the "logger" is here working today. I walked out to look at what they were doing and noticed that there is an older guy operating a skid steer giving directions to the two younger guys. One is pretty much standing around and the other is operating the saw.
Both guys have the same PPE on -- running shorts and a T-shirt. :jawdrop:
I watched the saw operator for a minute to confirm this. No other PPE at all. Of course I don't ACTUALLY consider running shorts and t-shirt to actually be PPE.
What are the OSHA or other regulatory standards for this? Is there someone I can call and have them drive by? This is absurd.
Good post... I have derailed this thread long enough...
Now, back on topic... WEAR YOUR PPE DAMMIT!!!
Gary
Does this mean Your not going to log neckeet? Thank you.
I better atleast get a kiss with that popcorn for that much.$20 a bag.....:hmm3grin2orange:
since they are not on your property or working for you.
then again,you could move up here to new england if you like being a snitch and a whiny busybody.
And clearly you don't have a strong reading comprehension and retention rate.
You missed my post where I said I know I overspoke initially about this and that I wasn't going to call anyone but that I was frustrated about this and shot off at the mouth.
And GOOD LORD guys, are those of you that are calling me a busybody just that non-observant? I can't help but witness what's going on RIGHT NEXT DOOR (even if we are separated by large yards) and am I nosey because I notice what people are doing in an activity that interests me?
Don't you guys notice other people's trucks or lawn equipment or Harleys or whatever you are interested in? Maybe I'm just observant.
I am sure that some of you who are criticizing my opinion have taken an unpopular position before. That shouldn't mean that anyone with a different opinion has a right to come along and call you names. I guess I'm saying, what happened to the mature approach of "agree to disagree without being disagreeable" (or without being a jerk)
Clearly we all differ about the use of safety equipment. I'm just sorry that people who choose to not use it affect me. I'm also sorry that the legal system still affords them the right to sue the manufacturer.
And clearly you don't have a strong reading comprehension and retention rate.
You missed my post where I said I know I overspoke initially about this and that I wasn't going to call anyone but that I was frustrated about this and shot off at the mouth.
And GOOD LORD guys, are those of you that are calling me a busybody just that non-observant? I can't help but witness what's going on RIGHT NEXT DOOR (even if we are separated by large yards) and am I nosey because I notice what people are doing in an activity that interests me?
Don't you guys notice other people's trucks or lawn equipment or Harleys or whatever you are interested in? Maybe I'm just observant.
I am sure that some of you who are criticizing my opinion have taken an unpopular position before. That shouldn't mean that anyone with a different opinion has a right to come along and call you names. I guess I'm saying, what happened to the mature approach of "agree to disagree without being disagreeable" (or without being a jerk)
Clearly we all differ about the use of safety equipment. I'm just sorry that people who choose to not use it affect me. I'm also sorry that the legal system still affords them the right to sue the manufacturer.
There are a couple of reasons I would be concerned, for one think about this, every chainsaw injury becomes a statistic, and who uses statistics?
Politicians use statistics to put new laws into effect. I'd rather use the existing laws and regulations regardless of how stupid they sometimes seem than wait for more laws to protect the ignorant. I think we have enough laws as it is.
Insurances companies look at statistics and base insurance rates for various high risk businesses. So if you carry insurance on your employees and business then this does affect you or it will down the road. Same goes for the land owner, even if the land owner says these guys have insurance she is still a possible defendant in a lawsuit if one of these guys is injured or killed while working on her property. Especially if the landowner doesn't insist on personal protection.
If you operate a chainsaw in a professional capacity this kind of unsafe activity will effect you. When accidents happen the media never looks at the fact that maybe it was just some weekend warriors bidding a job for beer money, no in the media eye it is automatically a pro and the industry comes under scrutiny, then politicians and insurance companies take a look and then laws are made and rates are raised and and and......
I don't agree with forcing anyone to use safety gear ON THEIR OWN TIME, but if you are doing a job for someone then you should protect yourself, your employees AND your customers.
What I'd do is talk to the land owner and let her know that she is liable as well if someone is injured on her property, maybe she'll have a sit down with the fat guy and at least get some safety glasses on those kids, nothing worse than a blinded guy weilding a chainsaw at full throttle.
Enter your email address to join: