joecool85
Addicted to ArboristSite
That's good for me I guess, but I find it hard to believe that people are getting below 19mpg. I have owned 2, 4.0 Rangers a 2003 that I wrecked and my 2004. Both were identical setups and got similar mileage. Granted I don't do much or any city driving but I always got above EPA sticker mileage. For what the 4.0 is pulling around I would expect to get 25mpg highway from a small truck. Why can't small trucks (any brand) get much better mileage than a full size? For comparison, my 4.6L F150 gets 19.5mpg highway. The truck is a lot bigger, weighs more, and gets similar mileage to any compact pickup with a V6. Hopefully the 2012 Ranger does better. The current platform is done at the end of 2011. I hope they keep all the good stuff and improve on everything else. The current Ranger is just too small for what I need but I LOVE that truck.
We might not get a 2012 Ranger, but if we do it will probably be the Euro one like they are doing with the Fiesta. From what I've heard the difference is that instead of a 2.5 and 3.0 V6 diesel offerings we will probably have a 2.0 I4 turbo ecoboost (gas) or something.