- Joined
- Dec 6, 2014
- Messages
- 21,332
- Reaction score
- 25,429
If I showed 2 Stihl RM chains, made 3 years apart, and the same homemade gauge could not be used.....
What good is that?
Is that OK?
What good is that?
Is that OK?
Well that's my problem then. I've been using Stihl ultra file oil. Regular for 3/8 and their picco oil for the low pro raker files.If it isn't sperm whale oil then the raker will bind in soft wood.
What about bananas?This type of gauge can be used on any brand of chain, just not on stupid hump safety chain. And you really only need one for each pitch, not every type of chain made by every manufacturer. Carlton tried that with the File-o-Plate and their own chain and it was a disaster.
And ya need to realize this isn't an apples and oranges discussion. The basic Oregon style raker gauge is a 'static' style gauge and most free hand filers don't use that type of a gauge for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is they don't count each stroke when they file or carry calipers around so each tooth is precisely the same length to get precisely the same raker depth adjustment from such a gauge. The only time I use one is on the camel hump safety chain where a progressive style raker gauge won't work. Those gauges suit some folks..., mostly because they've never used or understood the benefits of a File-o-Plate or Husky style raker tool. There's your basic 'apple' part.
This thread is about progressive style depth gauge tools which function on an entirely different principal to achieve effective (and progressive) depth gauge adjustment based on the changing relationship between the cutter and the raker as the tooth gets shorter and shorter and the raker gets further and further away (relatively speaking). The dynamics the physical changes of the chain present to this particular approach can obviously be calculated
and accounted for in several ways in order to modify the design or desired result of this type of tool based on the conditions or intended application of the process. The OP simply presented a way to do so..., good, bad, or upside down in anyone else's opinion. That's the 'orange' part.
My pic shows how the orange differs from the apple. If I have some time later I'll post a couple more.
Why would someone care about any of this beyond the theoretical? Many would suggest it's a far superior way to manage depth gauges than the Home Depot or TSC approach..., or Joe's Saw and Mower Shop who simply doesn't know there's another way to adjust depth gauges on professional saw chain.
Now if I want to make a few of these things as described in the beginning of the thread, there's a roadmap there to do so. If not, I've learned a bit more about the variables involved with using the progressive gauge approach and how they could possibly be manipulated to change the way my chains perform. How anal I wanna be about any of it is a pretty abstract consideration since I'm already pretty whacky about my filing and grinding and depth gauge maintenance just using the skills I already have and the store-bought Husky gauges. Not sure what's left of my brain cells can handle much more..., like throwing a pear or pineapple into the mix on top of everything else.
Enter your email address to join: