cpr
Addicted to ArboristSite
Super 250s are factory hotrods, but what about the 797s? Eh, not so much...
I bought this one a while ago and it has always been easy to start, ran well enough, but I never could register more than 120psi compression which is not where it should be. I raced it against my MC-91 and it got thumped and, in hindsight, I had put this saw at a disadvantage I either didn't realize or had forgotten. It had a 7 tooth sprocket on it and I could have sworn there was an 8 in there. So, I tore it down to get to the bottom of the lack of compression, but first the differences.
1. 797s had flatbacks, most Supers didn't. They had an adapter to fit the Walbro SDCs. This is an improvement.
2. Thick ring full-circle piston. I don't know how much difference ring thickness makes, but the thick ones are harder to find now. This is no change, but the full-circle part is not an improvement.
3. The piston is full circle because there's no boost ports (although I have heard that some early ones did. Neither of mine do). This is not an improvement.
4. The porting is different. They're all lowered. Takes away the high-rev, hot rod feel the 797s are known for, but adds in the long-bar torque the 125s wound up with. Depends on what you want, whether it's good or bad. I have a 50" bar it could wear so...
797 map courtesy brian13.
Super 797 map.
I believe that McCulloch put this saw out as a bridge between the 797 and the CP-125. It was a hard-tail and used up that production, but introduced a block design and power curves that the 125s would have. I have 101 maps, but it would be cool to see CP-125 and an SP-125 to see all the changes.
Now, on to the compression problem...
I bought this one a while ago and it has always been easy to start, ran well enough, but I never could register more than 120psi compression which is not where it should be. I raced it against my MC-91 and it got thumped and, in hindsight, I had put this saw at a disadvantage I either didn't realize or had forgotten. It had a 7 tooth sprocket on it and I could have sworn there was an 8 in there. So, I tore it down to get to the bottom of the lack of compression, but first the differences.
1. 797s had flatbacks, most Supers didn't. They had an adapter to fit the Walbro SDCs. This is an improvement.
2. Thick ring full-circle piston. I don't know how much difference ring thickness makes, but the thick ones are harder to find now. This is no change, but the full-circle part is not an improvement.
3. The piston is full circle because there's no boost ports (although I have heard that some early ones did. Neither of mine do). This is not an improvement.
4. The porting is different. They're all lowered. Takes away the high-rev, hot rod feel the 797s are known for, but adds in the long-bar torque the 125s wound up with. Depends on what you want, whether it's good or bad. I have a 50" bar it could wear so...
797 map courtesy brian13.
Super 797 map.
I believe that McCulloch put this saw out as a bridge between the 797 and the CP-125. It was a hard-tail and used up that production, but introduced a block design and power curves that the 125s would have. I have 101 maps, but it would be cool to see CP-125 and an SP-125 to see all the changes.
Now, on to the compression problem...