2000ssm6
Stihl User
tried it... makes too much wook out of cutting compared to a chain with the rakers set close to spec.
+1, that also makes it harder on your saw and easier to catch a spining chain to the onion.
tried it... makes too much wook out of cutting compared to a chain with the rakers set close to spec.
hmmm... Australian Carlton chain must be tempered differently. around here Stihl chains seems to be the hardest and longest lasting.
I like my Oregon LGX the most. Seems like it holds an ok edge, and as soon as the chain stops taking large chips, I'll run an 11/32nd file across the cutters 3 or 4 times and brush the rakers once or twice. Takes maybe 10minutes at most and I'm good to go for two or 3 tanks. For ME, LGX responds to my hand sharpening style the best, so it is my favorite. I could care less how the metal could be slightly softer than stihl. I really like my Carlton chain as well, but I can never seem to get it as sharp after a handfile compared to the oregon lgx.
The meanest cutting chain I've ran is on my ms361, I got the rakers so low that you wouldn't ever dream of making any sort of bore-cut with that thing, and to compare it to the others I run would be unfair as the rakers are seriously stupid low!
Yeh sure, I could go snap a few pics of that low-rakered chain tommorow.Can you show us some pictures of that chain. I have used 5/16 to clean out gullets! Dont bet the rent money on low rakers making fast cutting chain if you are up against a good filer, Lol! I do agree though, that low rakers have all the real problems you describe in your legal disclaimer!
Enter your email address to join: