Look in the mirror...
wood dust in the carb hard on the saw?
- Thread starter echomeister
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
Its called email notifications and multi tasking, boomer.
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
I multitasked throughout my career, but it was on work related things. This forum is not.
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
I see a nice guy there. So does my wife of 50 years, my children and my grandchildren, and all of my customers and colleagues.
Trust me your wife is either a weirdo like you are she's thought about killing you in your sleep.
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
Why would I trust you about anything?
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2019
- Messages
- 4,578
- Reaction score
- 9,258
Well you could trust him more than you can the dealer that told you that you tore your saw up with a tiny amount of oily fines that took the opportunity to jump inside the cylinder when you took the plug out!
echomeister
ArboristSite Operative
bwalker / hermio Outa my thread!
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2019
- Messages
- 4,578
- Reaction score
- 9,258
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
No, I would not. Whatever the cause of my saw losing compression to the point of being unusable, it happened after I changed the sparkplug and got sawdust into the cylinder, and it happened very rapidly. If the dealer cheated me, that is better than wishing I would get hit by a truck.Well you could trust him more than you can the dealer that told you that you tore your saw up with a tiny amount of oily fines that took the opportunity to jump inside the cylinder when you took the plug out!
Correlation isn't causation....
Alot of people probably have the same wish.
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
The platitude "correlation isn't causation" has been much misused by people who do not understand science. The fact is that correlation is not a sufficient attribute to prove causation, but it is a necessary attribute of causation. I.E., without correlation you cannot prove causation. As for the other comment, I have gotten PM messages from several on this forum that agree that you are a rectal orifice, but they advise me not to engage with you. It is probably good advice, but I despise seeing misinformation spread on any forum by the willfully ignorant.
That's another attempt by you to baffle us rubes with BS... in short you are a chump who got ripped off by a dealer despite being so smart, allegedly. I don't need a lecture on science from you. You lack an ability to apply scientific principles to the real world and it's pretty apparent to anyone with a clue.
And I can only imagine what collection of losers are pm'ing you. Guess what? I could care less.
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
You do need a lecture on science, but you are too stubborn in your ignorance to benefit from it. And when you say you could care less, that means you care. You cannot even communicate your views coherently.
This coming from the guy that didn't understand how different gasoline could affect carb tuning... or the genius that thought motor oil with tens of thousand of miles on could test as new.
Make no mistake, I could care less about you and your band of idiots.
echomeister
ArboristSite Operative
I shoulda put a smiley face on my last post. Just kidding.
I conclude that a little wood dust might just be good for a saw to ingest. Made so by manufacturer design.
Correlation != Causation ??
How about gravity. We really don't understand what it is, yet we are all sure that a hammer dropped from the table will seek out the toes.
I conclude that a little wood dust might just be good for a saw to ingest. Made so by manufacturer design.
Correlation != Causation ??
How about gravity. We really don't understand what it is, yet we are all sure that a hammer dropped from the table will seek out the toes.
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
Wrong again. I always understood how different gasoline could affect carb tuning. I never said anything to the contrary. I also never said that oil with thousands of miles on it was "as good as new". When new, the oil in question exceeded requirements for new oil. After 30,000 miles, it was not "as good as new" but still met the requirements for viscosity, base number, detergency, etc., of a new oil. Can you comprehend the difference? And as for your last statement, if you could care less, that means you must care. You logically must care for it to be possible to care less. I am sure your meaning is "I couldn't care less", but you said the opposite.
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
I think Einstein had a pretty good handle on it. The phenomenon you refer to is often called the Law of Selective Gravitation. It is responsible for such things as wrenches and sockets traveling horizontally while working on cars so as to land in the most inaccessible location.
You are lieing piece of crap.. you don't have a clue about different gasoline effect on tuning until someone explained it to you. As for the oil. The language I used is exactly what I said..
To be clear I DO NOT CARE..
Hermio
Addicted to ArboristSite
I always knew what you meant. But you seem to be rather illiterate, which is why you said the exact opposite of what you meant to say. And you just keep LYING (not lieing) about it, as you would not respond to my posts if you did not care at all. You also used incorrect grammar. Here is the corrected version: " You are a lying piece of crap. You didn't have a clue about the different gasolines' effects on tuning until someone explained it to you." The next group of words, "As for the oil", is a sentence fragment, not a sentence. The next sentence makes no sense at all. It seems to be saying something like "I said what I said."
