Here is your picThanks for imbedding the 441's weight, please help on this one as well if someone can. Take care. :msp_thumbup:
Here is your picThanks for imbedding the 441's weight, please help on this one as well if someone can. Take care. :msp_thumbup:
Maybe because it can't beat anything over it's size? Let alone hold up in logging conditions from what I've read. Consider the source.
Is this fact? or hearsay? Have you experienced this yourself? What experience do you have with multiple saw makes, old and new? Lets be honest here, most people that talk badly about other saw makes have never ran them, and certainly never taken them apart. Let me ask How many saws have you rebuilt? how many brands have you worked on? Have you ever seen the extreme use Matt has put his 7900's through?
The reason I brought the 7900 up is simply because it's my baseline, as it's a stock saw.
Where's my Kleenix. Have YOU ever worked on a Logging Crew? Done anything else but cut cookies? Have you ever cut a full cord of wood by yourself? Have you?
Anytime, anyplace, Andie...
I wish the loggers with a fleet of 7900s would chime in on how they hold up in the real world of logging. I think there was one guy on here that tried a few of them, can't remember who he was....
Anyone?
How about out we one up this, get in touch with Matt (A REAL PROFESSIONAL FALLER) and have him go up against Sam with his 7900. Now that would be a joke if you ask me.
So the 576AT and 441cm aren't even as fast as a 460? So how much of a better saw are they with the computer controlled carbs? We all know the regular 576 and 441 are slower than a 460. I'm just not seeing the reason to buy a 576 or 441 if they haven't gained all that much performance. I can tune a saw, that's no problem. This thread has me thinking a 372 or 460 is still the way to go when buying a new saw if you can tune one.
Just you and me Kiddo. Matt is another day. Be ready.
Thousands of cords? Not bad, you have nothing to fear then. I say let's throw down some $, like $5k to get started. You and I Andie. Shall I send a plane for you? Bring your checkbook, and your 7900.
So the 576AT and 441cm aren't even as fast as a 460? So how much of a better saw are they with the computer controlled carbs? We all know the regular 576 and 441 are slower than a 460. I'm just not seeing the reason to buy a 576 or 441 if they haven't gained all that much performance. I can tune a saw, that's no problem. This thread has me thinking a 372 or 460 is still the way to go when buying a new saw if you can tune one.
So the 576AT and 441cm aren't even as fast as a 460? So how much of a better saw are they with the computer controlled carbs? We all know the regular 576 and 441 are slower than a 460. I'm just not seeing the reason to buy a 576 or 441 if they haven't gained all that much performance. I can tune a saw, that's no problem. This thread has me thinking a 372 or 460 is still the way to go when buying a new saw if you can tune one.
The 441C-M is stronger than a 460, even stronger than an early dual ported 046. The vids are in the thread I did on the 441. Andre posted them. The stock 441C-M is considerably stronger than a stock standard 441.
Not doubting you can tune a saw. I am doubting you can do it tens of times per second.
So the 576AT and 441cm aren't even as fast as a 460? So how much of a better saw are they with the computer controlled carbs? We all know the regular 576 and 441 are slower than a 460. I'm just not seeing the reason to buy a 576 or 441 if they haven't gained all that much performance. I can tune a saw, that's no problem. This thread has me thinking a 372 or 460 is still the way to go when buying a new saw if you can tune one.
The 441C-M is stronger than a 460, even stronger than an early dual ported 046. The vids are in the thread I did on the 441. Andre posted them. The stock 441C-M is considerably stronger than a stock standard 441.
Now we have conflicting info, because Mdavlee's video's show the 576at losing to an 046. Yet it beat the 441cm when those other guys tested them? Correct?
Now we have conflicting info, because Mdavlee's video's show the 576at losing to an 046. Yet it beat the 441cm when those other guys tested them? Correct?
Enter your email address to join: