If that's true that's scarry...Stihl HP Ultra is JASO-FB. The lowest certification on JASO ratings.
If that's true that's scarry...Stihl HP Ultra is JASO-FB. The lowest certification on JASO ratings.
The one video was labeled wrong I believe. Should all be fixed now.
Andy's 064 was one, Matt's 064, then my Mastermind 460, and Jrsdws Treemonkey 460. Those 064's are fast..
Wish we did this test before I bought this. LOL. Arrived at my door today
View attachment 421304
View attachment 421305
I may have to run a few tests of my own now..
Its true. Myself and ron660 researched oils a yr and a half ago and found ultra to be fbIf that's true that's scarry...
Nice saw, and congrats!!
For what is is worth, IMO only,,
661's are for big wood. They were not made for cookie cutting at a GTG, in 24" Oak against a 460.
The 661's are not speed saws for that small wood, they are torque saws for big wood.
The 661 are made for wood like this big 50 something inch piece of Elm, that is what they live for, and this is were they will leave a 460 in the saw chips...
View attachment 421307
get ya a 36" bar, and go after that big ash you were telling me about
Nope. I like the 52mm bore myself.Mike have u used one of the 54 big bores on a 181 se?
I agree whole heartedly. . And that ash tree doesn't stand a chance!
Nice to meet you. We both came from 10 + hrs away to meet. I hope you enjoy that 461! It's a good saw.
Here's an interesting quote from that article...the opposite of what's been said on the forum here.
It was great meeting you as well & thanks for the saw! Very happy with it, I can see sending my 441 to a foster home now Got home last night and after I unpacked the truck and shower'd, I stood outside and fired up the 461, just to listen to it, and smiled ear to ear, what a great saw!!
Did you see the results, of the 441 vs 461, 28" bar, same chain & same wood, 31.9 to 22.9
Even Redbull ran the 461 and smiled and said, it makes me want it back now, I bet LOL
I quoted that exact article 2x in this thread already and seems no one got much from it? Bwalker said the article was pretty much hogwash
Is that a ported 461? They are strong saws. Little brother to the 661.
yes both the 461 & 441 in that test are ported by MM. I love my 441, a lot! I just got the 461 at the GTG over the weekend and ran a tank threw it. What a saw The 461 was not tuned as high as the 460 were, otherwise it might have pulled a faster time.
I don't think I buy that octane reduction theory..at least not with modern oils.Here's an interesting quote from that article...the opposite of what's been said on the forum here.
"One of the things you should do, is run high octane gas with any two-stroke mix. When all of the two strokes (the old days) were developed, they all used Castrol petroleum oil at a 20:1 ratio and found that 92 octane gas had the octane reduced to 72 with presence of that much oil. Modern oils won’t affect the fuel quite as much, but if you started with 86 or 87 octane regular fuel, you can see where you’ll end with a very low octane mix. "
Its not complete garbage but it's pretty dated and I don't buy the octane being reduced at all with modern oils.I quoted that exact article 2x in this thread already and seems no one got much from it? Bwalker said the article was pretty much hogwash
^^ that is correct .
Hell , some should try mixing the 30 grade motor oil at 16:1...hahaha !
Enter your email address to join: