661 Oil Test 32:1 vs 40:1 vs 50:1 ?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Looks like Klotz KL-200 is 23.3!

KLOTZ MSDS
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET KL-200
Klotz Special Formula Products, Inc. Telephone Number:
7424 Freedom Way 260-490-0489
Fort Wayne, IN 46818 260-490-0490 (fax)
Chemtrec – 1-800-424-9300
Chemical Name & Synonyms Chemical Family
Synthetic Lubricants 2 & 4 Cycle Lubricants
Trade Name Klotz Original Techniplate – KL-200(T), KL-199(T), KL-205
OSHA Hazard Classification: This product is not considered to be hazardous under 29 CFR 1910.1200
Boiling Point: N/A Specific Gravity: 1.002
Freezing Point: N/A % Volatile By Volume: <.1% @ 100 F
Melting Point: N/A Viscosity (cSt @ 100°C): 23.3
Vapor Pressure (mmHg): <1.0 @ 100 F Vapor Density (Air=1): N/A
Solubility in Water: Slightly Soluble Bulk Density: 8.364 lbs/gal
Evaporation Rate (Water=1): >1 Pour Point: -10 F uis
Decomposition Temp: N/A Appearance: KL-200(T), KL-205 Red Liquid
Odor: odorless to slightly musty KL-199(T) Clear, Natural Liquid
Weight per gallon: 8.364 lbs/gal
SECTION I - IDENTIFICATION
SECTION II - HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS
SECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA
SECTION IV - FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARD INFORMATION
Auto ignition Temperature: No Data
Flammability in Air: Lower: N/A
Upper: N/A
Flash Point: 370-445 F ( 187 – 229 C )
 
Ronnie cSt for r50 is 21.9 max. Pretty sure these other companies are listing max
Thanks. The standard method for the test requires an average and a deviation of no more than +/- 0.7%. The minimum for R50 is 16.3. I'm not sure about the other companies reporting values.....it could be a max.
 
If you want to be technical here's the order of oils from the thinnest to the thickest (Viscosity at 100C) according to their Tech sheets in cSt's:
I really wasnt wanting to get all testicles .................. I was talking about pouring the stuff into a container to mix
 
I just ran 3 tanks through the 661 with H1R @ 32:1 this weekend
I also ran 3 tanks through the freak (ported/snotted 066 by mdavlee) of R50 @ 32:1

Fuel was VP from a new 5 gallon jug for both.

The 661 piston top is brown dusty buildup
The 066 piston top is just about clean as new

I will run the next few tanks in the 661 with R50 @ 32:1 and keep an eye on the piston top

I will NOT be purchasing any H1R anymore, no matter what anyone else says and regardless of what anyones results show
 
I just ran 3 tanks through the 661 with H1R @ 32:1 this weekend
I also ran 3 tanks through the freak (ported/snotted 066 by mdavlee) of R50 @ 32:1

Fuel was VP from a new 5 gallon jug for both.

The 661 piston top is brown dusty buildup
The 066 piston top is just about clean as new

I will run the next few tanks in the 661 with R50 @ 32:1 and keep an eye on the piston top

I will NOT be purchasing any H1R anymore, no matter what anyone else says and regardless of what anyones results show
I'm wondering if MTronic runs richer than normal though.
 
/My 661 sure sounds richer than a properly tuned 660 or any non-electronic carbed saw. But it is turning 13,300 or so when lifted in wood. It sounds like it is running at 500 rpms at least fat/rich to me. And that's at 42:1.
 
If that's the case here, I'll certainly move on. I wanted to try it though. Jog my memory. What are you running now?
Maybe Motul 710 will be the ticket since VP puts it in their premix for chainsaws. It's 8.9 and hp ultra is 8.4. Lucas is 7.5. Redbulls initial tests showed hp ultra was faster than Belray. These oils, 710 or Lucas, at 32:1 or 40:1 should give plenty protection and give better performance from our saws. I'm sure Redbull will beat me to this test but I wouldn't complain. I'm also wondering if the same outcome from stocks saws will be the same with ported saws.
 
Back
Top