Elaborating more on the 572.
Seems like husqvarna is saving ”jersey numbers” and they wanted a solid model succeeding the 272, 372 to pin reputation on. They put a lot of time into development and testing and addressed issues like bearing failure on older saws along with experience from failures of earlier autotune saws. I’m looking at you, 550xp (mk1) and 562xp (early revisions).
Power to weight is excellent, even with it being an extremely durably built saw. It’s more powerful than the 272/372. In the wood, it apparently competes just fine with the Stihl analogs (462 etc), but I honestly cant speak there from personal experience. Yes, you’re going to get a better ratio with the 90cc saws (duh), or the 500i sthil, which is also in it’s own class in other respects, including price, availability, etc.
Air filtration is the best I’ve seen on any saw, and without the “high top” that makes ergos a bit harder.
Fuel usage is very much “wtf how is my tank still full?!“
I should say I’m NOT happy that the autotune system is essentially a sealed black box. I’d love to see open source Common Service Tool software. It simply hasn’t been a point of failure though.
The only problems we’ve had with this saw have been bad gas. Full stop.
Pro-tip: Tru-Fuel sucks. Nothing but problems with that stuff. Harder starts, poor power. Fresh off the pump 87 with random 2cycle oil is preferable. Mind that I’m not throwing canned fuel in general under the bus.
It’s too easy to forget that these are still carbureted engines. They’ll run on less than ideal fuel, but if the carb is set for good fuel and the the tank is full of crap, yeah, starting is more of a challenge. It’ll adjust FAST once it wakes up, but if the engine isn’t turning, the carb isn’t adjusting.