Sawyer Rob
Addicted to ArboristSite
just reading through this thread,I;ve noticed a few things you guys on the far side of the pond seem to get up to, you all deem to favour BSM over CSM because of less waste..??, how much do you loose when you plane the timber to get rid of the ripples caused by blade deflection, and just how portable are your BSM in rough going, I also noticed some one saying that they cant get reliable cuts under 1" with theyre CSM , I dont have any of these problems using my M7, with the logosol pico chain setup, kerf is 1/4" no deflection, and dead true, I am able to repeatably produce 1/8" thick slices (do this just to show the versitility of the mill), and because of its light weight, can carry it into the middle of the stand of timber I'm working on. As for the BSM being quicker, on the first cut, maybe so, but over several logs my M7 isnt far behind, and unless your using a machine with full hydraulics for levelling and turning the logs, can usually produce more quality timber. The other thing is how many of your BSM can comfortably handle logs of over20ft in length, or 30" dia easilly, and still be portable
WOW, i guess you haven't been around a BSM run by someone who knows what they are doing. Ripples caused by blade deflection??? I thought that Myth was put to bed long ago...
My LM2000 BSM will mill a 32" x 20.6" long without any problem at all, and i'll get a LOT more quality lumber out of that log than anyone will with a CSM, and i'd be willing to bet i'll get it out a LOT faster too...
SR