Yea...lol. Those same engineers put a fixed high side jet on the Ms260 and then plugged the muffler up. Result was many scored skirts and chitty running saws.I was with you until you mentioned factory engineers !
Yea...lol. Those same engineers put a fixed high side jet on the Ms260 and then plugged the muffler up. Result was many scored skirts and chitty running saws.I was with you until you mentioned factory engineers !
Air cooled motors do not have tight tolerances.My first saw was a Homelite 7-19C made in 1959. So, you are thinking that newer saws do not have tighter tolerances ?
Pretty much.The myth of newer engines having tighter tolerances where did it even come from people just make **** up lol
Thanks for admitting that. And I guarantee what I said was 100% accurate.Look at post 99 of this thread. If you think that 20% or 30% of oil that was going out the exhaust with the raw fuel pre strato was doing anything
I actually never thought about it. I figured that whatever oil was mixed with the wasted gas was wasted right along with it. You think not and may very well be right.
I've messed around with cr500 motors that where in various states of tune for many years. I would not run any less than 40:1 in that particular motor. I always ran mine at 32:1 or more depending on load/use. The cast iron cylinder liner in concert with the forged pistons I prefer for that application are not very forgiving.18:1 was the cut off on mx within performance . It dropped 2% @ 32:1 & 6% @ 40:1 . They also mention 20:1 was routinely recommended in the higher rpm 125 class bikes & that 60:1 could be utilized within the 500 class due to lower rpm & better oil migration & puddling within the crankcase as residual evidence !
Oh , i had a lot of intense moments understanding the design rational of fixed main jets on numerous recreational engines . That were to be utilized within various elevations throughout the world . No achievable tuniability without a complete jet replacement . Then lets make it even worse & restrict the exhaust capabilities or install limitors or welch plugs or even epoxy to deter operator capable engine tuning for basic temperature or barometric pressure swings . Oh don't touch that , it will void your warranty , seriously as if I give a **** about any expressed limited warranty lol. I did the same with my 1980 lowrider back in the day . Drilled out the Welch plugs adjusted the low speed jet & replaced the high speed jet . Hell , it was running so rich at 6000' through the Smokie Mountains , it would barely start & run , until I gapped the plugs @ .050 to get to the closest dealer to borrow a drill & installed the new jet & retuned the bike . Anyhow yeah Engineer's . Thank God they then trashed the fixed jet Mikuni's & went back to tunable Kehien CV 's the next yr !Yea...lol. Those same engineers put a fixed high side jet on the Ms260 and then plugged the muffler up. Result was many scored skirts and chitty running saws.
I hear you , I never personally ran any MX bike that lean , especially at around sea level here , not near enough safety factor . I always ran 40:1 in my Enduro's & 32:1 in a Moto-x when modern quality 2T oil became the norm . I always like a little fatter oil ratio in performance related equipment . Especially , within Quality Forged pistons & Likosil performance liners . Oils cheaper than aftermarket parts & unscheduled downtime !I've messed around with cr500 motors that where in various states of tune for many years. I would not run any less than 40:1 in that particular motor. I always ran mine at 32:1 or more depending on load/use. The cast iron cylinder liner in concert with the forged pistons I prefer for that application are not very forgiving.
My first 260 would barely run with the stock carb. Very lean!Oh , i had a lot of intense moments understanding the design rational of fix high speed jets on numerous recreational engines . That were to be utilized within various elevations throughout the world . No achievable tuniability without complete jet replacement . Then lets make it even worse & restrict the exhaust capabilities or install limitors or welch plugs or even epoxy to deter operator capable engine tuning for basic temperature or barometric pressure swings . Oh don't touch that it will void your warranty , seriously as if I give a **** about any expressed limited warranty lol. I did the same with my 1980 lowrider back in the day . Drilled out the Welch plugs adjusted the low speed jet & replaced the high speed jet . Hell , it was running so rich at 6000' through the Smokie Mountains it would barley run until I gapped the plugs @ .050 to get to the closest dealer to borrow a drill & installed the new jet & retuned the bike . Anyhow yeah Engineer's . Thank God they then trashed the fixed jet Mikuni's & went back to tunable Kehien CV 's the next yr !
What was you elevation then , about sea level more or less ?My first 260 would barely run with the stock carb. Very lean!
As business decision your most likely correct !One might ask why they would be designed to achieve any more than that. And, at what cost to somebody who will likely never put 3 hours on one.
This one I just picked up has the carb with both screws, has plastic limiters I need to remove. I am going to drill 2 more holes in the muffler and see how I like it.My first 260 would barely run with the stock carb. Very lean!
UP of MI so maybe 1200'.What was you elevation then , about sea level more or less ?
Extra residual oil is another very good reason to use a bit more oil.Will some oils actually dry up over time? I just pulled apart a junkyard Husqvarna 50 that had a very nice oem piston/cylinder in it. The crankshaft was very difficult to move and I thought the bearings were shot. On a hunch I oiled them up and now they move freely. Oiling the seals seemed to make no difference.
This is a cause for concern if I was going to store a saw for any length of time, I'm now thinking fogging will be mandatory.
It seems so little oil was left in the crank of that saw, yet there is no scoring and it would be fine with just a new ring. Or perhaps this is carbon from blow by that has hardened over time and the oil loosened it up? It did have some carbon stains in the crankcase.
Maybe that extra bit of oil at 40:1 vs 50:1 will have another benefit besides reduced engine wear, more oil in the crankcase for long term storage.
That waxy substance is typically found when ester based oils break down, which they rapidly do in the presence of water and 02. Esters are actually made by reacting a acid with a fatty molecule of some sort, so the residue you noted makes sense.There is also a difference in the way some synthetic oils dry versus mineral oils. Some of the synthetics dry to nearly a wax type substance
Wow , almost as bad as Echo's reputation for factory lean condition . That's brutal !UP of MI so maybe 1200'.
Enter your email address to join: