I voted for the MS261C but the MS241C would do you proud.
Perhaps I should have added that while the budget supports only one good saw this year, in a year or two I may want to add a pole pruner or similar. We want to keep the cacao trees to about 12' tall so the pods can be picked from ground level, and if the upper branches can be cut back from ground level it certainly would help.If he had $$ to spend I'd suggest two saws. One super light 35cc for pruning, one 50-60cc for the less frequent trees.
241, 12” bar. That is the scalpel of a saw you need for the work you are looking to do.
and the 3/8 picco chain.241, 16 in bar.
And again.I thank all for the great comments. As of now, the vote is tied between the 241 and 261, with a few votes for "other." No surprise that no one picks the 311.
It will be about a week until I make the 100 mile run to the dealer on the far side of the island, so please keep your comments, votes, and suggestions coming. But if I was buying today it would be the 241.
I am persuaded that there are things the 261 would do better, but what is currently the tie breaker in my thinking is the idea that there is no one chainsaw that will be perfect for everything. If I buy a 241 now, it will be easier to justify buying an additional, larger saw later to handle the larger jobs, but if I buy the more capable saw now it is less likely that I can later justify buying a smaller saw. I would start out with a 16" bar, and probably change the 241 to a 14" bar whenever I would get a larger saw.
I ran this logic past the wife and she said it made sense to her to have multiple saws if needed in order to handle various size jobs. I guess she must feel guilty for the number of toys at her disposal.
I thank all for the great comments. As of now, the vote is tied between the 241 and 261, with a few votes for "other." No surprise that no one picks the 311.
It will be about a week until I make the 100 mile run to the dealer on the far side of the island, so please keep your comments, votes, and suggestions coming. But if I was buying today it would be the 241.
I am persuaded that there are things the 261 would do better, but what is currently the tie breaker in my thinking is the idea that there is no one chainsaw that will be perfect for everything. If I buy a 241 now, it will be easier to justify buying an additional, larger saw later to handle the larger jobs, but if I buy the more capable saw now it is less likely that I can later justify buying a smaller saw. I would start out with a 16" bar, and probably change the 241 to a 14" bar whenever I would get a larger saw.
I ran this logic past the wife and she said it made sense to her to have multiple saws if needed in order to handle various size jobs. I guess she must feel guilty for the number of toys at her disposal.
"A man's got to know his limitations." So said Dirty Harry in Magnum Force.If you're thinking of a larger saw down the road I'm going to ask why not look at a top handle? A 261 for bucking and felling trees up to 18" diameter would be more than sufficient, and a 193T would work great for trimming the small stuff.
If you're thinking of a larger saw down the road I'm going to ask why not look at a top handle? A 261 for bucking and felling trees up to 18" diameter would be more than sufficient, and a 193T would work great for trimming the small stuff.
"A man's got to know his limitations." So said Dirty Harry in Magnum Force.
Maybe top handles are no more dangerous than a standard chainsaw, and I had given thought to exactly what you suggest, but I think at my experience level I could be asking for trouble.
Personally I'd much rather use a 241 than a top handle. Top handle saws are for use in a tree, not on the ground.