That's a good post. Especially the last paragraph.why ya'll need to get in tallywacker measuring contests is beyond me.
The simplest way to avoid this is to provide citations. If youre going to get in a heated discussion. provide a scientific source to back your opinion.
I'm an electrical engineer, the field is so vast that I hate telling people what my degree is in during normal conversation. They'll ask me some relatively easy circuit question that I could have probably answered off the top of my head 20yrs ago, but I have CRS, the thimble is full. I get imposter syndrome all the time, I'm only comfortable being an expert in such a very small niche corner of it. Given time I can usually figure the stuff out, but on the spot, no.
All truly intelligent & wise people are completely open to the suggestion that their opinion can be incorrect, and are open to modifying it when presented real quantifiable data that is counter to that opinion.
Unfortunately some of this stuff is so basic it's like trying to explain the earth is round to a flat earthen. It really is. That and can you find a citation in the literature that suggests the earth is round? Probably not because it's settled science and there is no literature on it.
Much of what is being discussed here goes back to Charles kettering's work in the 1920's..