I'll admit I should have learned much more about boilers before I trusted my "licensed" installer and the manufacturer but I'm learning a lot now.
Why did this happen? I've read many opinions -- including those speaking of my ignorance -- which may be correct, but I'd prefer to believe my situation was supposed to happen so that good can come of it. Providence works that way.
Wisconsin's chief boiler inspector wants me to appear at the next state meeting to describe the situation, propose code safety changes and make recommendations to address the closed system boiler/pex problem. Before that, I will graciously invite the manufacturer to join in the solution rather than having the solution imposed upon them. Will the manufacturer be interested? Their certification expires on 11/08; if it is not renewed, they must stop making boilers. So, if they do not incorporate an automatically controlled draft by then, their days of boilermaking are numbered.
As part of the solution, I invited the relief valve manufacturer to develop a temperature/pressure solution that works with OWBs. Presently, they do not have a T&P valve with a desired max temperature of 200 degrees F.
This is all a big pain but, in the end, if my inconvenience saves lives, it is all worth it and perhaps my ignorance of boilers was by design.
And the fusible plug? It's worthy of consideration as an additional relief device; perhaps the final defense after draft control and T&P valves. It's something pure without moving parts -- maybe a 210 degree plug would be good.