guy with a chainsaw
ArboristSite Member
So .96 ring gap
Don`t think of myself as that but thanks. I just watched a young fellow that does not have much extra cash do a rebuild on a straight 6 Ford 300, he did not measure his crank but just went ahead and installed new inserts/rod bearings. Said his dad had rebuilt many 6`s and knew what he was doing. I offered Plastigauge and or my micrometers but they refused, saying it was a waste of time, the truck made 35 miles before the crank tore the inserts out and the rods destroyed the crank, now looking for a replacement crank and possibly rods for a 300 six cylinder.Ok thanks your a life saver
No need to file the ring ends completely flat, you only need to file enough off to get proper ring end clearance from the keeper pin in the piston. A set of 44.3 Cabers would be about right. Caber rings from DLA engine parts in Greece are easy enough to attain.Good to know so with the horizonal rings that I filed down to get flat ends do they make rings for old school pistons with vertical pins that are new of so send a link 44.2mm is the size of the bore
You need to file them for proper gap so go any size you can find, 44.3 was the closest ring that came up in my search, no one uses these old ring sizes these days so pickings are slim. If you can get 44.2 so much the better.Ok gotcha but why go 44.3 over 44.2on the rings I got the 44.0 when I got them from DLA
That is what came up when I ran a search, when filed the ring ends will be blunt enough to fit the ring end keeper well enough, only file them enough to get the .050 ring end clearance when fitted square in the cylinder. That should be plenty of clearance when fitted on the piston and yet provide much better compression.Is this what you where looking at
Enter your email address to join: