I dont think you can just increase the filter size using the same media and expect it to work to cover greater pressure/verlocities
Ben really needs to step in and school us
Complete "schooling" on filtration may require a 4 year engineering degree
I don't have time for a full explanation now, but - in short:
Filter are NOT sieves. They are constructed of fibres - usually ranging in size from 1-30 microns, with pore sizes of the filter generally much larger than the size of particles they collect.
Particles are (usually) captured due to a combination of inertial collection, interception and diffusion.
This document
www.tsi.com/documents/ITI-041.pdf explains the basics.
Particles can "bounce" when they hit a fibre and thereby make their way through a filter, or they can be "reentrained" after capture (less common).
Since filters are not sieves, how well they perform (wrt the above) depends entirely on the filtration velocity (face velocity) - measured as flow rate / face area of the filter. If you keep this value constant, then the filter will operate in the same way.
i.e. - if you have a saw that flows 10 cfm of air at WOT, and a saw that flows 20 cfm of air at WOT, then the latter should have double the filter surface area in order to operate the same. The pressure drop across the filter will in both of these cases then be the same - since the face velocity remains the same.
Hope this helps? I can post more later when I have time.