Okay, I can see that (even if I've not stayed at a Holiday Inn recently, whatever that means), and now that you mention it, it seems as though I can now recall having read it. So was the chrome removed from your chain in a parallel-to-the-surface manner or does it look somewhat like my field-dechromed chain?Originally posted by jokers
I have in my possession a chain which was de-chromed by Ken Dunn which has minute remnants of the corner radius leading me to believe that Ken`s objective was not to remove the radius, but rather the chrome as was his stated intention. ... [illuminaries cited] can`t get a chromed cutter any sharper than the thickness of the chrome ...
Since the molecules forming the chips/dust are not so generally "disassociated" as those forming air I'd think boundary layers wouldn't be so much of a factor. It might be a good idea to form a radiused "tunnel" along the inside of the corner (if you wanted the cutter to bypass chips while disturbing them the least, which sounds rather counter-productive in the big picture), but not at the expense of having the cutting edges extend as completely to the corner as possible.A perfect convergence of the inside angles on the tooth would be likely to cause turbulent flow of the chips wouldn`t it? [ then some "spud" logic about fluid dynamics]
It certainly would be more of an as<i></i>s-pain to stone the beveled (inner) edge of the cutter, but I bet it would produce a better result. Some day I may try to build a chain instead of just talk about it...
Glen